Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › Pre-Existing Conditions
9>9 Personal answerNo, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions |
社会 › Gun Buyback
9>9 Personal answerYes, and we should also demilitarize local police departments |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
社会 › Racial Sensitivity Training
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
教育 › 学生贷款
9>9 Personal answer是,而且增加政府资金投入,使得每个大学生都可免费接受教育 |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
9>9 Personal answerYes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist |
教育 › Free College for All
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Supreme Court Reform
9>9 Personal answerNo, the Supreme Court should be abolished, as it is undemocratic |
国内政策 › 禁飞名单枪支管制
9>9 Personal answer不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
医保 › 医疗补助
9>9 Personal answer应该,但是我宁愿换成单一付款人医疗保健制度 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
罪行 › Qualified Immunity for Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, and increase the personal liability for misconduct |
环境 › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
9>9 Personal answerNo, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels |
国内政策 › 爱国者法案
9>9 Personal answerNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
外交政策 › 北约
9>9 Personal answerNo, it is obsolete and should be abolished |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
医保 › Medicaid Work Requirement
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Congressional ban on stock trading
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 枪支责任
9>9 Personal answer应该,只要输的一方支付所有法律费用;以任何理由起诉任何人是我们宪法规定的权利。 |
罪行 › 对青少年的单独监禁
9>9 Personal answer是的,我们应该创造更多的社会计划来帮助预防罪犯以及使他们恢复正常生活 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, and abolish the police |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answerNo, but the path to citizenship should be made much easier |
罪行 › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › Medicare Drug Prices
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not as a substitute for existing welfare programs |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, and abolish the police |
经济 › Free Tax Filing
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 州内学费
9>9 Personal answer是的,他们也应该有资格获得财政援助和奖学金 |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 加班费
9>9 Personal answerYes, and all employees should be paid time-and-a-half for overtime hours regardless of their pay scale |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
总统大选 › 说客
9>9 Personal answer是的,而且禁止一切形式的游说 |
总统大选 › Electoral College
9>9 Personal answerYes, and switch to a ranked voting system |
罪行 › Collective Bargaining
9>9 Personal answerYes, and abolish police unions |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 折磨
9>9 Personal answer不,酷刑是不人道、不道德的,并违反第八修正案 |
教育 › School Vouchers
9>9 Personal answerNo, and ban private schools |
外交政策 › 无人机
9>9 Personal answer否,在国会没有宣战的情况下,军队无权这样去做 |
科学 › 转基因标签
9>9 Personal answer否,我们人工培育农作物已有几千年历史,而且标记只会使得人们产生,对科学毫无事实依据的耻辱感 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
9>9 Personal answer不 |
教育 › Universal Pre-K
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
教育 › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerNo, and education should not be privatized |
经济 › 房地产遗产税
9>9 Personal answerNo, and increase it at a progressive rate |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Military Congressional Approval
9>9 Personal answerNo, Congress should approve all military conflicts |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
9>9 Personal answerYes, or they should be nationalized |
环境 › Paris Climate Agreement
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 北约
9>9 Personal answer不,我们应当退出北约。 |
教育 › Open for Learning Recovery Benefit Program
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answerOnly from election campaigns |
外交政策 › India Arms
9>9 Personal answerNo, and we should not sell military weapons to any foreign country |
国内政策 › Edward Snowden(爱德华·斯诺登)
9>9 Personal answer是的,作为替代,请调查中央情报局和国家安全局局长 |
外交政策 › Jerusalem
9>9 Personal answer不 |
教育 › School Truancy
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
9>9 Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.