Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › Gun Buyback
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Pre-Existing Conditions
8>8 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 带薪病假
8>8 Personal answer是的,但是应该是联邦政府出资建立这个项目而不应该是公司来做。 |
经济 › 税
8>8 Personal answerYes, Bernie’s official website proposes a 0.5% tax on Wall Street Speculation, i propose a 3% tax and use that to fund College For All and eliminate student debt, plus the surplus of 1.22 trillion dollars. Then, expand social security 1300 dollars by forcing the rich to pay the same into social security as working families. Then, to fund Universal Pre-school, Universal Child Care, and Housing For All, Bernie Sanders proposes a wealth tax of 1% on household wealth above 32 million, 2% above 50 million, 3% above 250 million, 4% above 500 million, 5% above a billion, 6% above 2.5 billion, 7% above 5 billion, and 8% above 10 billion. It would raise 435 billion dollars a year, and since Housing For All would no longer be needed because of a UBI it would raise 285 billion dollars, mandate corporations pay CEO’s within 50 times the amount of their average employee, and if not the corporation gets a penalty, and use this to pay off medical debt, as well as an additional 70 billion a year, I would spend what is necessary to reach net zero by 2030 which would be 2.5 trillion dollars over ten years, and fund it through 308.5 billion dollars by making the fossil fuel companies pay(literally pay money as well as pay for it), $640 billion from the revenue generated from the wholesale of energy from the regional Powers Marketing Administrations, Supplemental Security no longer being needed which would save 121.5 billion dollars, 131 billion dollars by reducing the need for safety net spending due to new jobs, a UBI, and Universal Health Care savings would raise 0.702 trillion, 300 Billion by returning corporate taxes to what they were under Obama and making corporations fully pay their taxes, fund Medicare For All by cutting prices in half, raise the estate tax, taxing capital gains at the same rates as incomes for the rich and large capital gains, replacing the cap on local tax deductions, eliminating health tax expenditures, and imposing a 7.5% tax on employers other than small business employers, which combined would mak |
社会 › Racial Sensitivity Training
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
教育 › 学生贷款
8>8 Personal answerYes, and ban interest on student loans. Instead, make it similar to a mortgage, so that regardless of how long it takes to pay back you owe a set amount, and limit that amount to 105% of the original loan |
教育 › Free College for All
8>8 Personal answerYes, fund through a 0.005% tax on derivatives, a 0.1% tax on bonds, and a 0.5% tax on stock trades |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Supreme Court Reform
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 医疗补助
8>8 Personal answerYes, and we should have Medicare For All that is funded through cutting administrative costs 62.5% which would happen under a single payer system, cutting hospital costs 30%, cutting prescription drug costs 70%, and deny wasteful (unnecessary spending, spending money when there is no chance of recovery, or getting checked for stuff when there is no chance you have it.) |
罪行 › Qualified Immunity for Police
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
8>8 Personal answerYes, and we should have Medicare For All that is funded through cutting administrative costs 62.5% which would happen under a single payer system, cutting hospital costs 30%, cutting prescription drug costs 70%, and deny wasteful (unnecessary spending, spending money when there is no chance of recovery, or getting checked for stuff when there is no chance you have it.) |
环境 › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 移民劳动者
8>8 Personal answerYes, and grant citizenship as well as give them permanent amnesty |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 政府支出
8>8 Personal answerNo, Bernie’s official website proposes a 0.5% tax on Wall Street Speculation, i propose a 3% tax and use that to fund College For All and eliminate student debt, plus the surplus of 1.22 trillion dollars. Then, expand social security 1300 dollars by forcing the rich to pay the same into social security as working families. Then, to fund Universal Pre-school, Universal Child Care, and Housing For All, Bernie Sanders proposes a wealth tax of 1% on household wealth above 32 million, 2% above 50 million, 3% above 250 million, 4% above 500 million, 5% above a billion, 6% above 2.5 billion, 7% above 5 billion, and 8% above 10 billion. It would raise 435 billion dollars a year, and since Housing For All would no longer be needed because of a UBI it would raise 285 billion dollars, mandate corporations pay CEO’s within 50 times the amount of their average employee, and if not the corporation gets a penalty, and use this to pay off medical debt, as well as an additional 70 billion a year, I would spend what is necessary to reach net zero by 2030 which would be 2.5 trillion dollars over ten years, and fund it through 308.5 billion dollars by making the fossil fuel companies pay(literally pay money as well as pay for it), $640 billion from the revenue generated from the wholesale of energy from the regional Powers Marketing Administrations, Supplemental Security no longer being needed which would save 121.5 billion dollars, 131 billion dollars by reducing the need for safety net spending due to new jobs, a UBI, and Universal Health Care savings would raise 0.702 trillion, 300 Billion by returning corporate taxes to what they were under Obama and making corporations fully pay their taxes, fund Medicare For All by cutting prices in half, raise the estate tax, taxing capital gains at the same rates as incomes for the rich and large capital gains, replacing the cap on local tax deductions, eliminating health tax expenditures, and imposing a 7.5% tax on employers other than small business employers, which combined would make |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Medicaid Work Requirement
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Congressional ban on stock trading
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
8>8 Personal answerNo, decriminalize drug use |
医保 › Medicare Drug Prices
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
8>8 Personal answerYes, Bernie’s official website proposes a 0.5% tax on Wall Street Speculation, i propose a 3% tax and use that to fund College For All and eliminate student debt, plus the surplus of 1.22 trillion dollars. Then, expand social security 1300 dollars by forcing the rich to pay the same into social security as working families. Then, to fund Universal Pre-school, Universal Child Care, and Housing For All, Bernie Sanders proposes a wealth tax of 1% on household wealth above 32 million, 2% above 50 million, 3% above 250 million, 4% above 500 million, 5% above a billion, 6% above 2.5 billion, 7% above 5 billion, and 8% above 10 billion. It would raise 435 billion dollars a year, and since Housing For All would no longer be needed because of a UBI it would raise 285 billion dollars, mandate corporations pay CEO’s within 50 times the amount of their average employee, and if not the corporation gets a penalty, and use this to pay off medical debt, as well as an additional 70 billion a year, I would spend what is necessary to reach net zero by 2030 which would be 2.5 trillion dollars over ten years, and fund it through 308.5 billion dollars by making the fossil fuel companies pay(literally pay money as well as pay for it), $640 billion from the revenue generated from the wholesale of energy from the regional Powers Marketing Administrations, Supplemental Security no longer being needed which would save 121.5 billion dollars, 131 billion dollars by reducing the need for safety net spending due to new jobs, a UBI, and Universal Health Care savings would raise 0.702 trillion, 300 Billion by returning corporate taxes to what they were under Obama and making corporations fully pay their taxes, fund Medicare For All by cutting prices in half, raise the estate tax, taxing capital gains at the same rates as incomes for the rich and large capital gains, replacing the cap on local tax deductions, eliminating health tax expenditures, and imposing a 7.5% tax on employers other than small business employers, which combined would mak |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 资产增值税
8>8 Personal answerYes, increase to 31.5% for the bottom 99% and tax at the same rate as their income for the top 1% |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 州内学费
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 奥巴马医改
8>8 Personal answerYes, and we should have Medicare For All that is funded through cutting administrative costs 62.5% which would happen under a single payer system, cutting hospital costs 30%, cutting prescription drug costs 70%, and deny wasteful (unnecessary spending, spending money when there is no chance of recovery, or getting checked for stuff when there is no chance you have it.) |
总统大选 › 说客
8>8 Personal answer是的,而且禁止一切形式的游说 |
总统大选 › Electoral College
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Collective Bargaining
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerIch bin mir unsicher |
医保 › 退伍军人事务私有化
8>8 Personal answerLess, and we should have Medicare For All that is funded through cutting administrative costs 62.5% which would happen under a single payer system, cutting hospital costs 30%, cutting prescription drug costs 70%, and deny wasteful (unnecessary spending, spending money when there is no chance of recovery, or getting checked for stuff when there is no chance you have it.) |
教育 › School Vouchers
8>8 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools instead |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
8>8 Personal answerWho cares? |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
教育 › Universal Pre-K
8>8 Personal answerYes, fund through a wealth tax |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
8>8 Personal answerNo, we cannot afford a war with Russia. |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Military Congressional Approval
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Paris Climate Agreement
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 国内工作
8>8 Personal answerNo, instead tax foreign corporations on their profit from the US |
教育 › Open for Learning Recovery Benefit Program
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Juneteenth
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › India Arms
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Jerusalem
8>8 Personal answerIt should be split |
教育 › School Truancy
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.