Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › LGBT收养权
RM>RM Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
医保 › COVID Mask Mandate
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
医保 › COVID-19 Vaccine
RM>RM Personal answerNo, I think this is risky and I would not get it anyway. I have already been around it and had it. |
医保 › Pre-Existing Conditions
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gun Buyback
RM>RM Personal answerYes but only military grade weapons |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
RM>RM Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
RM>RM Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Religious Service Ban
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 伊朗
RM>RM Personal answerNo, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels |
社会 › Racial Sensitivity Training
RM>RM Personal answer是的 |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
RM>RM Personal answerNo there is none |
教育 › Free College for All
RM>RM Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
RM>RM Personal answerDepends on the seriousness of the crime. Murder and rape automatically deported after serving sentence. |
国内政策 › 禁飞名单枪支管制
RM>RM Personal answerDepending on the reasoning behind being put on the "no-fly list". |
国内政策 › Supreme Court Reform
RM>RM Personal answerNo, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized |
国内政策 › 国家安全局国内监控
RM>RM Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Qualified Immunity for Police
RM>RM Personal answerYes, but only for officers who have no record of any serious crimes or anything worse than a misconduct |
环境 › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
医保 › Medicaid Work Requirement
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
移民 › 边境墙
RM>RM Personal answerIf illegal immigration is significantly decreased, because of it, then yes. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
RM>RM Personal answerYes, but only for drug dealers, not users |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
RM>RM Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
医保 › Medicare Drug Prices
RM>RM Personal answerMy opinion is neutral. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
RM>RM Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
外交政策 › Soleimani
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
移民 › 州内学费
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
RM>RM Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
RM>RM Personal answerNo, but they need to release their medical record at the start of their campaign or re-election campaign. |
总统大选 › Electoral College
RM>RM Personal answerNo, but I think that the PEOPLE of the United States should be the first thing that the people that count the vote first... The only time that the electoral college is used to determine president is if there is a tie |
外交政策 › 军费支出
RM>RM Personal answerIncrease, but only to pay our troops more and after the deficit is reduced. |
罪行 › Collective Bargaining
RM>RM Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
科学 › 核能
RM>RM Personal answerYes, but with more oversight to ensure safety of citizens |
外交政策 › 外国援助
RM>RM Personal answerYes, but only if the US gets a say in what the countries are using the funds for. |
医保 › 退伍军人事务私有化
RM>RM Personal answerno opinion, not enough information |
教育 › Universal Pre-K
RM>RM Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
RM>RM Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
国家安全 › Military Congressional Approval
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
环境 › Paris Climate Agreement
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
RM>RM Personal answerYes, but only Facebook. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
科学 › 宇宙的探索
RM>RM Personal answeryes, but we should focus more on saving the earth than space |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
RM>RM Personal answer不,太多富有的公民正在滥用海外银行法律的漏洞逃税 |
外交政策 › India Arms
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 国家安全局监视
RM>RM Personal answer不应该,暗中监视我们的盟友会严重损害我们在国外的声誉 |
外交政策 › Jerusalem
RM>RM Personal answerIt is not for a nation not involved to make this decision |
教育 › School Truancy
RM>RM Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
RM>RM Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 19 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.