Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
4>4 Personal answerpro-choice and pro-life. In cases where there has been rape, incest or danger to mother: abortion any time. In other cases, abortion only if baby cannot live independently without mother, ie, outside of mother's body. |
社会 › 宗教自由法案
4>4 Personal answerthe answer is no, unless, and of the utmost importance, the religion involves harm of another person(s) |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answer是的,禁止所有移民,直到政府改善其筛选过程 |
社会 › 计划生育资金
4>4 Personal answer应该,他们的服务远不止堕胎,还可以通过癌症筛查、产前服务和领养推荐等挽救许多生命 |
环境 › 气候变化
4>4 Personal answergovernment needs to regulate the pollution of the planet, not just for climate change; saving the planet is unnecessary, the planet will save itself. However, humans are capable of making the earth inhabitable for themselves. |
经济 › 带薪病假
4>4 Personal answer是的,但是应该是联邦政府出资建立这个项目而不应该是公司来做。 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
4>4 Personal answeryes. absolutely. Also, minimum wage, no voting yourself increases, absolutely no perks of any kind. People in congress should be there for the good of the country. Period. This is done in more advanced societies. One term, OUT. |
教育 › 学生贷款
4>4 Personal answer是,而且增加政府资金投入,使得每个大学生都可免费接受教育 |
社会 › 邦联旗
4>4 Personal answerno, they lost. what could possibly be the point of this ? |
国内政策 › 禁飞名单枪支管制
4>4 Personal answerIf the people on the no fly list are too dangerous to fly and also too dangerous to buy a gun why are they not dangerous to everyone in other aspects ? Home made guns are available, as are many home made weapons. More importantly, who are the people making these lists, what are their qualifications and affiliations, and how can anyone challenge a no fly-no buy list ? |
国内政策 › 国家安全局国内监控
4>4 Personal answer不,只有出示搜查令表明是为了犯罪行为才可以。 |
移民 › 非法移民拘留
4>4 Personal answer是的,所有非法移民都应该被交送到联邦执法机构并驱逐出境 |
医保 › 医疗补助
4>4 Personal answer应该,但是我宁愿换成单一付款人医疗保健制度 |
国内政策 › 爱国者法案
4>4 Personal answerI have never met anyone who has read the patriot act and even those enforcing it have not read it. Question, how can a person support something they do not know anything about. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
4>4 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 枪支责任
4>4 Personal answer应该,只要输的一方支付所有法律费用;以任何理由起诉任何人是我们宪法规定的权利。 |
移民 › 技术移民
4>4 Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
经济 › 资产增值税
4>4 Personal answer不应该,提高资本收益税将限制我们经济中的投资 |
移民 › 州内学费
4>4 Personal answer不应该,所有的非法移民都应该被驱逐出境 |
医保 › 奥巴马医改
4>4 Personal answerNo, health care as a basic taxpayer right. |
经济 › 加班费
4>4 Personal answer是的,政府应该采取更多措施保护工人的权利 |
外交政策 › 折磨
4>4 Personal answer不,我们要严格遵守日内瓦公约的法律 |
外交政策 › 对朝鲜的军事打击
4>4 Personal answer不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
4>4 Personal answernot enough information to give an answer |
外交政策 › 无人机
4>4 Personal answerAbsolutely not. This is killing innocent people and making people in this country unsafe. |
国内政策 › 社会保障
4>4 Personal answerNo, and stop spending current funds on other programs |
国内政策 › Edward Snowden(爱德华·斯诺登)
4>4 Personal answer是的,作为替代,请调查中央情报局和国家安全局局长 |
经济 › 养老金改革
4>4 Personal answer是的,养老金支出已经失控,必须减少 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.