Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 枪支管制
4>4 Personal answerThere is enough restriction. It'd be great if we would enforce the ones we have rather than create new ones. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
社会 › 计划生育资金
4>4 Personal answer应该,他们的服务远不止堕胎,还可以通过癌症筛查、产前服务和领养推荐等挽救许多生命 |
经济 › 带薪病假
4>4 Personal answer是的,但是应该是联邦政府出资建立这个项目而不应该是公司来做。 |
教育 › 学生贷款
4>4 Personal answerYes, the rich should pay higher taxes but it'd be for more than education. They should pay AT Least the same amount I do as a middle class working person. Fair is fair. |
国内政策 › 禁飞名单枪支管制
4>4 Personal answer是的,但前提是黑名单的筛选过程被证明是准确的,且程序必须正当。 |
国内政策 › 国家安全局国内监控
4>4 Personal answer不,只有出示搜查令表明是为了犯罪行为才可以。 |
国内政策 › 操纵改划选区边界
4>4 Personal answer是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件 |
移民 › 非法移民拘留
4>4 Personal answer不应该。太多非暴力移民正在被驱逐出境 |
医保 › 医疗补助
4>4 Personal answer应该,但是我宁愿换成单一付款人医疗保健制度 |
移民 › 边境安全
4>4 Personal answerNo, if we would just use the system we have instead of either trying to create new loopholes for corporate interests to profit from or restrictions imposed by fear Mongering religious freaks, we'd be far better off. |
外交政策 › 以色列
4>4 Personal answerIt pisses me off that we give Israel full health coverage for its people but we say we can't do that here. Am an active duty military wife with a grown son who cannot afford dental benefits and high priced medication but there's so many who balk at the idea of lowering our country welfare system. How is this acceptable? Wtf is wrong with people? They are clearly ignorant. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
4>4 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
社会 › 宪法第一修正案
4>4 Personal answer应该,但不应该浪费金钱去删除现有的引用 |
国内政策 › 枪支责任
4>4 Personal answerNo. People decide how to use these weapons. The accountability should be on them. They should be accountable if the firearm is faulty and backfires, but they should not be liable when a person uses a weapon as it was meant to be used. Unless they sold the firearm in an illegal way, evading the regulations or creating loopholes to sidestep existing laws. |
罪行 › 对青少年的单独监禁
4>4 Personal answer是的,我们应该创造更多的社会计划来帮助预防罪犯以及使他们恢复正常生活 |
社会 › 安乐死
4>4 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
移民 › 州内学费
4>4 Personal answer是的,他们也应该有资格获得财政援助和奖学金 |
外交政策 › 折磨
4>4 Personal answer不,我们要严格遵守日内瓦公约的法律 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
4>4 Personal answerDecrease. We cannot care within our boarders properly, using tax money to 'help' is insulting and pointless. We seldom improve anything with our involvement. It seems a ploy for corporate interests. |
外交政策 › 对朝鲜的军事打击
4>4 Personal answer不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题 |
国内政策 › 社会保障
4>4 Personal answerNo, eliminate the income cap on taxable earnings and stop spending current funds on other programs instead |
外交政策 › 国家安全局监视
4>4 Personal answerThey have always done this. It's what they do. |
外交政策 › 古巴
4>4 Personal answerIt sucks for poor Cubans and it seems great for corporate and special interests. They've been making money off of the sweat of Cuba for a while now, why not officially create that loophole. |
外交政策 › 俄罗斯在叙利亚发动的空中打击
4>4 Personal answerNo, it's not our business. Don't we have enough to deal with in Iraq and Afghanistan? Holy shit! We haven't fixed anything. We have made it worse. The only thing we could do is get OUT of places we shouldn't be. |
经济 › 养老金改革
4>4 Personal answer否,由私人管理账户,会对老年人的财政安全造成损害 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.