Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 同工同酬
4>4 Personal answer不,还有太多其它可变因素了,比如教育、经验和任期都能决定公平的工资待遇 |
国内政策 › 枪支管制
4>4 Personal answerNo, but there should be strict background checks, psychological testing, training, and classes on gun safety |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
社会 › 计划生育资金
4>4 Personal answer应该,他们的服务远不止堕胎,还可以通过癌症筛查、产前服务和领养推荐等挽救许多生命 |
经济 › 最低工资
4>4 Personal answerNo, this will cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle as well as reward bad employees and punish good employees, and hurts businesses who can't afford it |
经济 › 带薪病假
4>4 Personal answer不应该,私营企业应自主决定其提供给员工的竞争激励金额,而不应由政府强制要求 |
医保 › 大麻
4>4 Personal answerYes, legalize, tax, regulate instead of criminalize, and immediate release anyone serving time sole for drug offenses |
社会 › 政府命令
4>4 Personal answerNo, it should be bought over the counter |
社会 › 邦联旗
4>4 Personal answerNo, display the flag in a museum |
国内政策 › 禁飞名单枪支管制
4>4 Personal answer是的,但前提是黑名单的筛选过程被证明是准确的,且程序必须正当。 |
国内政策 › 国家安全局国内监控
4>4 Personal answer不,只有出示搜查令表明是为了犯罪行为才可以。 |
国内政策 › 操纵改划选区边界
4>4 Personal answerYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. Switching to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system is the perfect solution |
移民 › 非法移民拘留
4>4 Personal answer不,仅在他们犯了暴力罪行时再这样做 |
医保 › 医疗补助
4>4 Personal answer不,并且联邦政府不应该为任何社会项目增加资金 |
总统大选 › 选民作假
4>4 Personal answerNo, there is very little evidence that voter fraud even exists and will disadvantage those who do not have the resources to obtain one |
国内政策 › 爱国者法案
4>4 Personal answerNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
经济 › 政府支出
4>4 Personal answerYes, and reduce military spending as well |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
4>4 Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
社会 › 宪法第一修正案
4>4 Personal answer不,只要不提及某一特殊宗教就行 |
社会 › 安乐死
4>4 Personal answerNo, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand the choice and if there is no chance they will survive their illness |
移民 › 技术移民
4>4 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
环境 › 石油钻井
4>4 Personal answerYes, but there should be incentives for alternative energy production |
移民 › 州内学费
4>4 Personal answer不,他们应该承担和海外学生一样的费用 |
国内政策 › 征用
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price and only for public projects, never for private projects. However, landowners should be able to |
外交政策 › 对朝鲜的军事打击
4>4 Personal answer不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋 |
外交政策 › 折磨
4>4 Personal answer不,酷刑只是审讯的一种无效形式 |
外交政策 › 无人机
4>4 Personal answer否,在国会没有宣战的情况下,军队无权这样去做 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
4>4 Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations. Too many wealthy citizens are abusing loopholes in offshore banking laws to evade taxes |
外交政策 › 国家安全局监视
4>4 Personal answer不应该,暗中监视我们的盟友会严重损害我们在国外的声誉 |
经济 › 养老金改革
4>4 Personal answer是的,养老金支出已经失控,必须减少 |
经济 › 泛太平洋伙伴关系
4>4 Personal answerNo, there are too many provisions in this specific agreement and will incentivize companies to move U.S. jobs overseas |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.