More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Libertarian voters
Last answered 5 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Libertarian voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by sciencealert.com.au
6 years ago by deccanchronicle.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by cnsnews.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Should we prospect for gold on Mars? Should we mine the already abundant resources we have with current technologies. Should we only eat green eggs and ham? The word "we" assumes that "we" are making an intelligent decision via... 6 years ago from a Republican in Addison, TX
No, because we already have a huge oil supply that is nowhere near empty and the idea of running low on oil is only there as an excuse to drastically increase the price of oil. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Richland, WA
We should open up the thousands of the gas and oil wells that have been capped over the years. I used to work in the oil field and I know that there is enough gas and oil in the United States to last the world thousands of years. 6 years ago from a Republican in Altoona, IA
No, because we have enough oil already in the country. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in East Petersburg, PA
Why is this an option? Who are you people and why did you START doing this?. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Potwin, KS
Yes as long as it doesn't affect wildlife. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Spearfish, SD
The energy sector should be owned by the public, but divided up into regional or local divisions, while we don't expand and maintain current offshore oil wells. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Santa Maria, CA
Yes. We have enough energy to self sustain ourselves. I have twenty bucks. Why do I need to borrow ten bucks from some Slim Shady who's gonna charge me fifteen cents on the dollar?. 6 years ago from a Republican in Nashville, TN
Yes, but require severe penalties for irresponsible/illegal disregard for safety protocols. Corporate officers should be incarcerated for negligent oversight of subordinates actions, as is done in the military!. 6 years ago from a Republican in Tucson, AZ
Oil is poison wherever it is, millions of gallons leak from the ocean floor naturally. If we burn it we are at least returning the base components like carbon to the environment. And we might as well keep fuel costs low while replacement clean technology... 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Elfers, FL
Yes, but not yet. As worldwide reserves dwindle with time, our offshore supplies will become strategic and economic assets of immesurable value. While we have the wealth to purchase this irreplaceble resource form sources abroad, let us do so, then make... 6 years ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS