Assistance programs help homeowners who are at risk of losing their homes due to financial difficulties by providing financial support or restructuring loans. Proponents argue that it prevents people from losing their homes and stabilizes communities. Opponents argue that it encourages irresponsible borrowing and is unfair to those who pay their mortgages.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
State Senate District
Zipcode
Response rates from 21k America voters.
57% Yes |
43% No |
57% Yes |
43% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 21k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 21k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NTH43Q1yr1Y
Yes, as long as drug abuse, alcoholism, or other irresponsible behavior weren’t factors in the foreclosure
@bunnies444 1yr1Y
Yes, only if there is proof that the homeowner is doing everything in their power to keep their home.
@9NJDLB21yr1Y
Depending on situation I believe the government should provide assistance
@9SGS2K21yr1Y
Yes, but only if they are facing foreclosure due to things out of their control. If they bought a mansion they can't afford the government should let them fail just like big businesses that overextend themselves.
@9PT6LY31yr1Y
Yes, as long as alcoholism, drug abuse, or other forms of irresponsibility played no role in the foreclosure
@9V9LV4Q1yr1Y
Situational - ex. Paid mortgage for 20 years never late and became ill. Couldn’t pay mortgage because medical treatment was 7,000 a month
@9Q3B6HP1yr1Y
no, but there should be more help available afterwards and no penalties for first time foreclosures/evictions
@B63SK5W 2mos2MO
Yes, only if there is solid proof that the homeowner is doing everything in their power to keep their home
Join in on the most popular conversations.