More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Less than High School voters
Last answered 2 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Less than High School voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 9, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by rt.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by theguardian.com
5 years ago by nytimes.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
There is not enough clear information of pros/cons to make an informed decision. Fracking chemicals should absolutely be made known along with all potential side effects, and affected communities should have the opportunity to vote for themselves. We... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Pasadena, CA
Yes, but not in highly populated areas with more vision on what the results to the earth are and if its more harm then good sotta stop. 6 years ago from a Republican in San Jacinto, CA
No absolutely not. all current sites should be shut down and completely cleaned up and restore
to its pristine original conditions. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Brisbane, CA
Some fracking is perfectly harmless, and helpful. It's not a black and white issue, there are degrees of harm done, including none at all. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Wisconsin Dells, WI
No, we would pursue more sustainable energy sources AND it is destroying our environment. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Salt Lake City, UT
Yes, but watching the movie, Gas Land, makes me very bias about regulations. They need to make sure they have high regulations so people cannot light their tap water on fire due to natural gas in their wells. 6 years ago from a Republican in Laona, WI
If there is an earthquake has it been studied in that Fracking could be the cause??? I believe any company who has the potential to endager live such as the last hazardess waste poisoning of water should pay into a cleanup program (which should remain... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lawrence, MA
Yes, but continue to monitor to insure that the practice is safe and the public is not being overtly affected. 6 years ago from a Republican in Tempe, AZ
I'm not informed enough to have an opinion on this topic. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Apple Valley, CA
Unknown,the jury is still out Need more data on risks to water supply and earthquakes. 6 years ago from a Republican in Universal City, TX
I don't have enough knowledge of the method to give an opinion at the moment. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Beech Grove, IN
Yes. However, sustainable energy sources need to be researched, so we don't have to drill, which is the real problem. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Tulsa, OK
It depends on what liquids are used for the process (e.g., water vs. chemicals). 6 years ago from a Democrat in Long Island City, NY
Yes, but depending upon the depth of the drilling. 6 years ago from a Green in Littleton, CO
Yes if detailed research data is collected and analyzed while using this form of oil extraction. This data should be used to refine and evolve the practice of fracking to make it safer and to understand it's long term effects. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Branson, MO
Yes if it can be done responsibly without harm to neighbors, wildlife or the environment. And they should pay fair taxes as well as pay into a catastropy fund. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Philadelphia, PA
It should be allowed with proper governmental inspections and regulations.
All drilling should be subject to Clean Air and Water Acts. 6 years ago from a Democrat in West Jordan, UT
Yes, but with tighter regulation, including full disclosure of all chemicals used, strong precautions against groundwater contamination, and prohibition where the risk of mini-earthquakes in populated areas is great. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Austin, TX
Yes, but the chemicals used in the fracking process need to be made public. Owning a proprietary blend of chemicals shouldn't be considered when it is being pumped into public land, and ultimately, water tables. 6 years ago from a Green in Rochester, NY
Ok to allow, but continue research on long-term effects. 6 years ago from a Republican in Phoenix, AZ