More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (Single Moms) voters
Last answered 3 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (Single Moms) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 9, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
7 years ago by rt.com
7 years ago by net.au
7 years ago by theguardian.com
7 years ago by nytimes.com
7 years ago by net.au
7 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
There is not enough clear information of pros/cons to make an informed decision. Fracking chemicals should absolutely be made known along with all potential side effects, and affected communities should have the opportunity to vote for themselves. We... 8 years ago from a Democrat in Pasadena, CA
Yes, but be smart about it- I.E. Take into consideration where you will be fracking and if it will affect peoples homes, water, health and overall well being and quality of living. 8 years ago from a Republican in North Richland Hills, TX
Yes, but we need greater safeguards, oversight and strict enforcement, with significant penalties, of companies that damage the environment. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Boerne, TX
Unknown,the jury is still out Need more data on risks to water supply and earthquakes. 8 years ago from a Republican in Universal City, TX
Yes, in the instance you own all the property, not simply rights. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Grand Rapids, MI
Neither support or oppose. Those doing the work should be held liable for damages, if any. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Bethesda, MD
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking and we should pursue more sustainable energy sources as well. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Colton, CA
I don't have enough knowledge of the method to give an opinion at the moment. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Beech Grove, IN
Not familiar enough with procedure to make an educated guess. 8 years ago from a Republican in Lansing, IL
Yes if it can be done responsibly without harm to neighbors, wildlife or the environment. And they should pay fair taxes as well as pay into a catastropy fund. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Philadelphia, PA
Yes, but the chemicals used in the fracking process need to be made public. Owning a proprietary blend of chemicals shouldn't be considered when it is being pumped into public land, and ultimately, water tables. 8 years ago from a Green in Rochester, NY
Yes, but continue research into long term effects and have companies accept responsibility for environmental problems it may create. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Woodbridge, VA
Yes, as long as we use hydraulic fracking in a way that is safe for the environment. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Gloucester City, PA