More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income (Less than $25K) voters
Last answered 5 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income (Less than $25K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 9, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
8 years ago by rt.com
8 years ago by net.au
8 years ago by theguardian.com
8 years ago by nytimes.com
8 years ago by net.au
8 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
I support hydraulic fracking in the U.S., ONLY, if it is AMERICAN OWNED interests doing it.
I am against foreign corps. (the Chinese) performing this here. 9 years ago from a Republican in Norwich, NY
Yes, but there needs to be verifiable evidence that it does not harm the ground water sources before it can be used. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Denver, CO
Increase overesight, and scientific monitoring of fracking to determine if the process endangers water supplies, decreases ground stability, or has other harmful environmental effects. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Wilsonville, OR
No, we would pursue more sustainable energy sources AND it is destroying our environment. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Salt Lake City, UT
If there is an earthquake has it been studied in that Fracking could be the cause??? I believe any company who has the potential to endager live such as the last hazardess waste poisoning of water should pay into a cleanup program (which should remain... 9 years ago from a Democrat in Lawrence, MA
I don't know enough about this issue. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Mchenry, IL
Yes, as long as we continue to search for more sustainable practices with rapidity. 9 years ago from a Green in Glenview Nas, IL
Yes, in the instance you own all the property, not simply rights. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Grand Rapids, MI
I don't have enough knowledge of the method to give an opinion at the moment. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Beech Grove, IN
Yes natural resouces, no oil. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Tallahassee, FL
Yes if it can be done responsibly without harm to neighbors, wildlife or the environment. And they should pay fair taxes as well as pay into a catastropy fund. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Philadelphia, PA
Yes, but there should be enforced regulations to prevent environmental damage. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Ingomar, PA
Yes, but the chemicals used in the fracking process need to be made public. Owning a proprietary blend of chemicals shouldn't be considered when it is being pumped into public land, and ultimately, water tables. 9 years ago from a Green in Rochester, NY
Ok to allow, but continue research on long-term effects. 9 years ago from a Republican in Phoenix, AZ
Yes, as long as we use hydraulic fracking in a way that is safe for the environment. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Gloucester City, PA