Try the political quiz
+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 506k America voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 506k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 506k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8JCJLWV from Texas  answered…6yrs6Y

 @9HB5MKV from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Absolutely to gather intelligence. Assassinations should be reserved solely for confirmed terrorists with proof that they have or will attack our nation or an ally

 @5923DDKfrom Colorado  answered…6yrs6Y

We are killing innocents. We are destroying hospitals by mistake. Sometimes I think about the panic our citizenry would fly into if other nations started using killer drones on us. We would be outraged. And yet here we are, doing this very thing to them.

 @9GK257P from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

Absolutely to gather intelligence. Assassination should be reserved for undeniably confirmed terrorists

 @9GN5KWP from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

Absolutely to gather intelligence, but assassinations should be permitted only for confirmed, not simply suspected, terrorists

 @9F4MSCF from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this is a violation of these country’s sovereignty as well as a violation of international law.

 @BCTS26Q from Georgia  answered…3wks3W

 @BBRDTVP from South Carolina  answered…2mos2MO

We should be able to gather intelligence but should not conduct military action without host country permission or if there's undeniable evidence of an imminent and direct threat to the US or it's citizens.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Drones” news articles, updated frequently.