More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Constitution Party
Last answered 1 hour ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Constitution Party.
Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power
No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jul 25, 2016. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
Learn more about NATO
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is an intergovernmental military alliance formed by 28 countries in 1949 after the Second World War. To join NATO each member country pledged to spend at least 2% of their GDP on military spending and defense and defend each other against threats from any non-member country. In a July 2016 interview with the New York Times Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump suggested that the United States would not defend NATO member countries who had failed to increase their military budgets to above 2% of Gross Domestic Product. The suggestion defies a pact made by NATO members when it was formed in WWII that they would defend each other against any attack by a non-member nation. France, Turkey, Germany, Canada, and Italy are countries that are currently spending less than 2% of their GDP on military defense. See recent NATO news
More stances on this issue
We need to worry about our own backyard and stop saving the world. 1 year ago from a Constitution in Meadowbrook, VA
Renegotiate NATO. All participants should pay their fair share . 1 year ago from a Constitution in Ellicott City, MD
Yes, The USA should pull out from NATO but still intervene or assist countries that are unable to defend themselves from hostile enemies or if the stability of the country is required for the benefit of our economy or national security. 1 year ago from a Constitution in The Meadows, FL
Yes and apply pressure for those underfunded countries to live up to their arrangement. We're not there yet for breaking our end of treaty. 1 year ago from a Constitution in Uracus (Farallon de Pajaros), MP
Regardless, we should withdraw from NATO, but continue to support our allies that are willing to defend themselves first. 1 year ago from a Constitution in Oak Grove, KY
Yes, but only if there is an imminent attack. 1 year ago from a Constitution in Big Chimney, WV