Choose a tag to find specific types of discusisons.
These are currently the most active tagged discussions.
@ISIDEWITH submitted…12hrs12H
On Wednesday, in Moldova, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken became the first administration official to publicly leave open the possibility that the Biden administration might “adapt and adjust” its stance about attacking inside Russia with American weapons, based on changing battlefield conditions.“We’re always making determinations about what’s necessary to make sure that Ukraine can effectively continue to defend itself,” Mr. Blinken said.His statement was the latest amid a drumbeat of calls for a shift, from allies and from within Mr. Biden’s administration. Mr. Blinken, who returned from a sobering trip to Kyiv earlier this month, reported to the president that the Ukrainians might not be able to hold the territory between Kharkiv and the Russian border unless Mr. Biden reversed himself. That earlier warning was conveyed privately, in keeping with Mr. Biden’s deep aversion to letting debates among his inner circle leak out and create pressure on him to shift strategy.The usually cautious outgoing leader of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, told The Economist in an interview published late last week that Ukraine’s losses of territory near Kharkiv could only be countered if Ukraine was free to take out artillery and missile launchers and command posts on the Russian side of the border.“To deny Ukraine the possibility of using these weapons against legitimate military targets on Russian territory makes it very hard for them to defend themselves,” Mr. Stoltenberg said. On Tuesday, the leaders of France and Germany joined that chorus. Britain already allows its weapons to be fired at military targets inside Russia.
▲ 148 replies1 agree
This policy change is long overdue. Ukraine should be able to hit any military targets in Russia whether deep or just in…
@ISIDEWITH submitted…46mins46m
▲ 73 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…6hrs6H
▲ 89 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…9hrs9H
▲ 86 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…10hrs10H
▲ 85 replies
▲ 88 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2hrs2H
▲ 78 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…4hrs4H
@ISIDEWITH submitted…38mins38m
▲ 52 replies
▲ 66 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…3hrs3H
▲ 54 replies
@FederalistSophiefrom New Jersey agreed…12hrs12H
▲ 41 reply1 disagree
@ISIDEWITH submitted…8mins8m
▲ 24 replies
@MindRights from New York commented…11hrs11H
▲ 48 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…5hrs5H
▲ 44 replies
@AwedCicada from Mississippi commented…49mins49m
▲ 31 reply1 agree
@DebonairDiplom4cyfrom Florida commented…11hrs11H
▲ 31 reply1 disagree
@ISIDEWITH linked…9hrs9H
▲ 2
@SpecialInterestBuzzardfrom Maine commented…9mins9m
@ISIDEWITH submitted…11hrs11H
▲ 25 replies
@Pl4tformHaileyfrom Hawaii disagreed…11hrs11H
@LizardZoe from Pennsylvania commented…11hrs11H
@ISIDEWITH asked…5hrs5H
