How is it morally acceptable for Russia to penetrate deep into sovereign Ukrainian territory to murder soldiers and civilians alike, but Ukraine is not allowed to strike Russian territory?
I realize the risk of escalation, but Russia started this war and bears full responsibility for any escalation arising therein.
The most important consideration is for both the US and Russia to adopt an (internal) No First Use policy for nuclear weapons.
Here are the top political news stories for today.
@92VHLQ8Constitution2yrs2Y
There is no such thing as morality or rule of law in international relations. Never had been and never will be.
However Russia's actions are rational and in pursuit of her national security interests, namely preventing the expansion of NATO into Ukraine. It is completely reasonable why Russia is strongly opposed a NATO base in ukraine, especially considering that NATO has exhibited an extremely aggressive foreign policy over the last 30 years.
Quite frankly there was no justifiable reason to keep NATO around after the end of the Cold war, and the US's irresponsible decision to continu… Read more
Join in on more popular conversations.
