Try the political quiz
+

6 Replies

 @MinorityWhipCoconutEnvironmentalism from Texas  commented…12mos12MO

Using water as a weapon in political disputes is dangerous for people and ecosystems on both sides—rivers don’t know borders, and jeopardizing shared water risks environmental disaster for the whole region.

 @ElephantEmiliaIndian Nationalismfrom Texas  commented…12mos12MO

High time India shows Pakistan that there are real consequences for supporting terrorism—water is our lifeline and we have every right to protect our people first. Maybe now Pakistan will think twice before turning a blind eye to terror camps on their soil.

 @HeronJimmyHindu Nationalismfrom Michigan  commented…12mos12MO

It’s about time India took a tough stand—why should we keep honoring a treaty when Pakistan keeps sponsoring terror against us?

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…12mos12MO

Why Pakistan has put 'act of war' tag on India's Indus Water Treaty move

https://telegraphindia.com

For Pakistan, the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab aren't just rivers — they’re arteries. And now the heartbeat is faltering

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…12mos12MO

Mint Explainer: India puts Indus Waters Treaty on ice—what’s at stake for both sides

https://livemint.com

From blocking inspections to reshaping dam rules, here’s what India’s Indus Treaty pause enables—and where its limits lie.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…12mos12MO

Indus Waters Treaty suspended: India has many options, says expert

https://thehindu.com

India has said the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) of 1960 with Pakistan will be held ‘in abeyance’ with immediate effect, until Islamabad credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism.