Try the political quiz
+

10 Replies

 @AffectedCampaignLeft-Wing Populismfrom New York  commented…1yr1Y

Kill one person and you’re a murderer, kill 100,000 and you’re “increasing shareholder value”

 @DovesJayLibertarian from Illinois  agreed…1yr1Y

Part of liberalism's training to focus on individualism. Individual actions are recognized as horrifying, while systems fade into the background to become invisible

 @P0pularVot3ApplesDemocratfrom Missouri  commented…1yr1Y

The level of rage at rapacious corporations is so deep and so broad that the entire internet is basically celebrating the gunning down of a health insurance CEO, but yeah I’m just not sure if Democrats’ best move is to embrace real economic populism.

 @UnforgettableGranolaLibertarian from Michigan  disagreed…1yr1Y

The Dems get PAID by the big insurance companies to look the other way. They're not going to change a thing.

 @7VDZ83HProgressive Left from Minnesota  agreed…1yr1Y

I'm surprised and encouraged by the level of outrage. It runs across the political spectrum.

Only an "eat the rich" economic justice warrior populist who punches up can defeat a far-right populist who punches down in this political climate

 @DemocraticArianaSocialist from Pennsylvania  commented…1yr1Y

A good thinkpiece would be to interview healthcare executives and ask them how it feels to know most Americans would love to see them die

 @TwoPartyJakeDemocrat from Minnesota  commented…1yr1Y

Between denial of benefits, life insurance plot by the wife, and share holder value; the motive is a mystery. Sure they found the script used to deny coverage on the shells but that could just as easily be a ruse rather than a manifesto.

 @Pl4tformBagelsDemocratfrom Montana  commented…1yr1Y

 @83RYF99Veteran from Missouri  commented…1yr1Y

Maybe it was an Alex Murdaugh scenario but the dude he hired to help him fake his death found a higher bidder or just aimed too well.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this general discussion.

Last activeActivity9 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias96%Audience bias75%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown