Try the political quiz
+

14 Replies

 @CockyLlamaDemocratfrom Maine  commented…2yrs2Y

The state of US infrastructure is shocking. Symptomatic of an economy underinvesting in itself.

Got to raise the dollars from somewhere.

 @Gr4ssrootJerkyDemocrat from California  commented…2yrs2Y

Really? The US has more railway than any other country. US tax burden as a percentage of GDP is slightly below-average compared to other nations. It's the entitlement spending in the US that has gone up significantly.

 @StressedChamoisGreen from Wisconsin  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Railways??? They were mainly laid down in the 19th century! The US has virtually no modern high speed rail & many of its great cities are well short of having satisfactory metro/urban rail/tram networks.

 @Gr4ssrootJerkyDemocrat from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The US has the largest rail network by length in the world. High-speed rail lags in comparison to other countries, but as always, people take that criticism as meaning that the US is actually worse off than other countries, rather than just being a flaw that needs improvement.

 @StressedChamoisGreen from Wisconsin  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Ranking nations rail infrastructure based on miles laid is insanity. You just need to book one train journey outside a city in the US and in germany/switzerland/UK to know this. The only place I have seen less useful passenger train infrastructure than the US is Canada

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  disagreed…2yrs2Y

It's unconstitutional and immoral for the federal government to participate in infrastructure programs, because it robs the majority of the states and communities for the benefit of a favoured few, in the hopes of winning their votes. The American Union was made for the "General Welfare" of the States – meaning each State should share the benefits and the burdens of the union without favouritism. Federal infrastructure favours some states over others.

 @VoleBarryLibertarian from Nevada  commented…2yrs2Y

This only means a price increase to consumers because this gets passed on. Here is why Trump cut corporate taxes to 21%: Europe tax rate is at 20% with Ireland at 15%. Corporations were leaving dollars earned overseas overseas because US corporate tax rate was at 38%. Also, corporations weren't very competitive with Europe. You will have thinner wallets under Harris.

 @BatBillDemocrat from Georgia  disagreed…2yrs2Y

They didn't Lower the prices after the tax cuts .. they did the opposite and still moved their factories to China

 @VotingVicunaRepublican from Alabama  commented…2yrs2Y

I'm sorry, come on people if you don't understand that the tax rate corporations pay is calculated their tax rate into their pricing, you just don't understand how things work. Sounds great, tax corporations at 28%, guess what, your already high prices will go up some more. Why do you think the selling price of company valuations is based on EBITDA. (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes Depreciation and Amortization.

 @SausageDickSocialist from Oregon  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Cool, let’s tax them 0%, I’m sure all those savings will be passed to the consumer, right?!

 @G0vernanceOilLibertarianfrom Maine  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Taxes have become punitive. Only used to punish people democrats don't like.

They could tax corporations 75% and it would raise enough money to fund the federal government for a couple weeks.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How might Harris’ plan to raise the corporate tax rate influence your view on the fairness of the US tax system?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe corporations should pay more taxes than individuals, and why or why not?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If higher corporate taxes lead to more government services, would that trade-off be worth it to you personally?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...