Try the political quiz
 @ISIDEWITHNewsterrorismdeath penalty9/11Lloyd AustinMilitary Justice•••1mo ago

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin Revokes Plea Deal for 9/11 Mastermind and Co-Conspirators

In a surprising move, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III has revoked plea deals that would have avoided the death penalty for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the accused mastermind behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and two of his alleged accomplices. This decision also included the dismissal of the official overseeing the military commissions, marking a significant shift in the handling of these high-profile cases. The plea deals, which had been years in the making, were aimed at bringing a long-awaited closure to the proceedings. However, Austin's intervention underscores the complexity and sensitivity surrounding the prosecution of those accused of orchestrating the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil. The decision to revoke these plea agreements opens the door to a renewed pursuit of the death penalty, signaling a commitment to holding the accused accountable through the military justice system.

6 Replies

 @PassionateTheRightConservatism from Texas commented…1mo1MO

Finally, someone's taking a stand for justice for the 9/11 victims and their families. Scrapping those plea deals shows a real commitment to ensuring these terrorists face the full weight of the law.

 @Bureaucr4tDoughnutProgressive from Arkansas commented…1mo1MO

It's crucial that we ensure a fair trial for everyone, even those accused of heinous crimes; revoking these plea deals raises questions about the pursuit of justice and the potential for further extending the families' wait for closure.

 @RavenSarahLibertarian from Florida commented…1mo1MO

Government intervention in legal proceedings like this just underscores the need for a more transparent and consistent justice system, free from political influence.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

Does revoking a plea deal years after negotiation undermine trust in the justice system?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

Should ethical considerations override the pursuit of capital punishment in terrorist cases?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

Is it more important to seek justice or closure in cases like the 9/11 attacks?

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1wk1W

Kamala Harris says she will not ban fracking

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris told CNN on Thursday that she would not ban fracking if elected president.BASH: I want to get some clarity on where you stand on some key policy issues. Energy is a big one. In — when you were in Congress, you supported the Green New Deal. And in 2019 you said, quote, “There is no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.” Fracking, as you know, is a pretty big issue, particularly in your must-win state of Pennsylvania.HARRIS: Sure.BASH: Do you still want to ban fracking?HARRIS: No, and I made that clear on the debate stage in 2020, that I would not ban fracking. As vice president, I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not ban fracking.BASH: In 2019, I believe in a town hall you said — you were asked, “Would you commit to implementing a federal ban on fracking on your first day in office?” and you said, “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking. So yes.” So it changed in — in that campaign?BASH: What made you change that position at the time?HARRIS: Well, let’s be clear. My values have not changed. I believe it is very important that we take seriously what we must do to guard against what is a clear crisis in terms of the climate. And to do that, we can do what we have accomplished thus far.: In 2020 I made very clear where I stand. We are in 2024, and I have not changed that position, nor will I going forward. I kept my word, and I will keep my word.

▲  97 replies