Try the political quiz
+

12 Replies

 @SadBi11R1ghtsGreen from New Jersey  commented…2yrs2Y

Real question is

Which politician will be the first to address the elephant in the room

Bitcoin is a public ledger that is too old and slow to ever be mass adopted and actually used as a currency

 @HedgehogEllaPeace and Freedom from Tennessee  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Was I transported back to 2016 talking points?

 @SadBi11R1ghtsGreen from New Jersey  disagreed…2yrs2Y

No. We are actually in the future

Where the conversation will shift to zero knowledge proofs and security

A public ledger is a massive security risk and is unconstitutional

Thought this was about freedom after all

 @CynicalSenateSeatLibertarian from Indiana  commented…2yrs2Y

Is this really Elizabeth Warren’s position?

’I don’t see a move toward a policy that embraces terrorists and ransomware scammers,” she said.’

 @SoreUnit3dNationsLibertarian from Nebraska  commented…2yrs2Y

Beware of the Big Bluff. Harris and her advisors are in the process of working on a "reset" with the crypto industry.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How important is it for political figures, like Vice President Harris, to balance the excitement around new technologies like cryptocurrencies with the warnings from skeptics about potential dangers?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Would the possibility of gaining campaign contributions and support from wealthy crypto industry leaders justify a political party changing its stance on cryptocurrency regulation?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe political leaders should prioritize the innovation and freedom represented by cryptocurrencies, or should consumer protection and financial stability take precedence?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If embracing cryptocurrency could lead to significant technological advancements and economic growth, would you support a softer regulatory approach, despite potential risks such as fraud or money laundering?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Should the Democratic Party adopt a more open stance towards cryptocurrencies to potentially gain the support of younger, tech-savvy voters, or does that risk compromising ethical or regulatory standards?