The longer the service is allowed to decay, the more precarious America’s strategic situation will become.
Turning things around won’t be easy. The best solution would be to retain every combat ship in the current fleet and encourage allies to pitch in with their own industrial bases. This expansion will require substantial funding, particularly in the workforce.
Since 2023 the Houthis have harassed ships exiting and entering the Suez Canal but sunk few vessels. Well-trained American and allied surface combatant crews have intercepted scores of missiles and drones, and U.S. Navy strike fighter squadrons have bombed Houthi missile launch sites. Nevertheless, insurance premiums for the Suez route have increased, and the Suez Canal Authority has lost almost 70% of its shipping traffic despite lower transit fees.
The number of ships in the Navy has shrunk since its Trump administration high of 296 and, as per construction and procurement funding, won’t reach more than 300 ships until 2032. Maintenance and repair delays have piled up rapidly. Only 60% of the attack submarine fleet is deployable at any given time. The rest is tied up in maintenance. Two supercarriers are out for an additional year-plus due to unspecified turbine damage. The U.S. is retiring surface warships faster than it can build them. Its new ships, most notably the Constellation class frigates, carry half the firepower of an Arleigh Burke class destroyer at around two-thirds of the price. The Navy has also struggled in vain for nearly two decades to retain talent.
Sea control is nonnegotiable for a dominant maritime power. The U.S. needs to deploy its forces from North America and shift them between different parts of Eurasia.
If it can’t maintain a strong naval presence, it will be forced to follow the British rental-cum-alliance model, and its credibility across Eurasia will decline rapidly.
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
Surface Ships are increasingly anachronistic targets.
The cutting edge weapons of robotic submersibles, hypersonic missiles, drones, and low-earth orbital satellites will likely rule the maritime battlefields of the future.
Given the Trillions spent on climate change boondoggles, we probably could have replaced our entire Navy Fleet.
@SheepishBoarsForward2yrs2Y
That's exactly why Musk is claiming the high ground on all these people. It's game over for world government war mongers.
@P0llingPlaceTonyVeteran2yrs2Y
It would be nice if the Navy could make a ship it wants. Apparently Littoral Combat ships and the Zumwalt destroyers were lemons. A lot of time and money went down a rat hole. Seems like the Navy may have a leadership and accountability problem. I don't remember anyone being strung up on the yardarms because of procurement or design errors.
@D3baterCamelGreen2yrs2Y
The Zumwalt destroyer wasn't a lemon, it was just so darn expensive that any sort of production in numbers was out of the question.
The LCS were indeed lemons. Even if they had actually operated without their many flaws, the intended mission they were designed for was a very short-sighted mistake, which became apparent shortly after Xi came to power.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Join in on more popular conversations.