Try the political quiz
+

8 Replies

 @PunditTomatoeProgressive from New York  commented…2yrs2Y

It's frustrating to see the Supreme Court dodge a crucial decision on social media laws that have clear implications for free speech and the battle against misinformation online.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Supreme Court sends state efforts to regulate social media platforms back to lower courts

https://pbs.org

The court Monday returned the cases to lower courts in challenges to the law from trade associations representing the platforms.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Supreme Court sends Texas and Florida social media moderation laws back to lower courts

https://techcrunch.com

The Supreme Court on Monday vacated two judicial decisions concerning Republican-backed laws from Florida and Texas aimed at limiting social media companies' ability to moderate content.

 @AlertT3rritorialLibertarian from New Mexico  commented…2yrs2Y

Typical government overreach, trying to meddle in private business practices instead of letting the market decide what content should stay up or come down.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Should the perceived political bias of social media platforms justify government intervention in content moderation policies?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If a social media law limits platform moderation, could it protect free speech or rather harm the user experience by allowing harmful content?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you think social media platforms should have the freedom to moderate content as they see fit, or should government regulations ensure a form of neutrality?

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Supreme Court sends GOP-backed social media cases back to lower courts in moderation fight

https://usatoday.com

The Florida and Texas state laws were passed in 2021 over concerns that conservative views were being suppressed on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.