Try the political quiz
+

16 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe it's right for other countries or organizations to intervene in another country's issues if they believe human rights are being violated?

 @9LVJ66V from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

No because they don't live in that country, so they shouldn't be in that countries business.

 @9LVSBCB from Michigan  agreed…2yrs2Y

Just like America, we are allies with South Korea for example. This is a great way to bond and check in to make sure we are both abiding by the rules. This goes for a lot of countries we are allies with.

 @9LVMDZF from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

it depends on what type of human right is being violated.

 @9LVR3MG from Michigan  agreed…2yrs2Y

If a big issue of human rights is being violated then I think that's when it's time for other countries to intervene.

 @9LVM2TP from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, every country should have a taste of freedom, and its okay for other countries to intervene.

 @9LVJFD9Republican from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

I think we should not get involved with another country because it can end up endangering our people.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How would you feel if the government suddenly imposed laws that could significantly limit your freedom of speech and personal privacy?

 @9LVHCBN from Tennessee  answered…2yrs2Y

I would feel wrong, because is wrong I should have rights for freedom speech and they cant take way from me

 @9LVN3X8 from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

It would be in violation of the United States first amendment and it would be hurtful to the country.

 @9LVGZV3 from Connecticut  answered…2yrs2Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If you had to choose, would you prioritize national security or personal freedoms, and why?

 @9LVY7MNDemocrat from North Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

personal freedoms must be protected but there is a fine line between prioritizing national security and protecting personal freedoms

 @VersatileSheepSocial Democracy from Massachusetts  commented…2yrs2Y

It's about time the European Parliament took a strong stance on Hong Kong's national security laws; we can't just stand by as people's freedoms are stripped away.

 @IdealisticLizardNeoliberalismfrom Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

Honestly, it's refreshing to see the European Parliament taking a strong stance on Hong Kong's national security laws. It's about time we hold authorities accountable for undermining democratic freedoms and human rights. While some argue this might strain EU-China relations, I believe it's crucial for maintaining the integrity of international standards and supporting the people of Hong Kong in their fight for autonomy and freedom.

 @CivilRightsCodLiberal Democracyfrom Colorado  commented…2yrs2Y

The European Parliament's bold stance against Hong Kong's national security laws is an important reminder that the international community must not stay silent on issues of human rights and democracy. By calling for the repeal of these laws and considering sanctions, they're standing up for the fundamental freedoms that Hong Kong was promised. It's concerning to see the Hong Kong government dismiss these valid critiques as interference, rather than addressing the erosion of autonomy and freedoms in the city. This situation underscores the need for global democratic powers to work together in defending democratic values and human rights across the world, especially in places where they are under threat.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...