Try the political quiz
+

14 Replies

 @PaellaDeanRepublican from Tennessee  commented…2yrs2Y

Ukraine's problem stems from lack of people to fight. Zelensky has, so far, been unable to institutionalize needed measures like reducing pensions, cutting benefits to wealthy Ukrainians, or reducing the draft age to 18. $60 billion is not going to be nearly enough to defeat Russia, which has now fully moved to a wartime economy and is growing faster than developed western economies, and outproducing us in tanks and shells. This is not about stopping Russia. It is about postponing the inevitable Ukrainian collapse until after November.

 @CulturedL0bby1stLibertarianfrom North Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

And if thousands more Ukrainians die in the meantime? Well, that is just the cost of getting Biden re-elected. No biggie.

 @FilibusterFredLibertarianfrom Louisiana  commented…2yrs2Y

There actually is a plan here.

This business of war is a trillion-dollar enterprise and there’s a group that profits even if it is a disaster - the military-industrial complex.

Our congress critters are by and large agents of the military-industrial complex and they do their bidding. War funding is approved despite public opposition and the propaganda from the mass media supports all of this. If you want to know more about all this search on Mike Benz.

You know what’s naive? Those who claim that Ukraine is a paragon of “democracy” in a battle of good vs. evil. Here’s the TRUTH about the Zelensky regime:

 @GleefulCockatooGreenfrom Maine  agreed…2yrs2Y

If we didn't have perpetual enemies, how could the MIC make so much money? You are spot on and it is a shame that people can't see that they are being fleeced. We are stacking another trillion dollars on the debt every one hundred days. How long can that last?

 @9LQKRXR from Florida  commented…2yrs2Y

At this point it is good that the U.S. is providing Ukraine with weapons for defense. It is unfortunate that the U.S. killed negotiations early on when it had the chance.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Considering the potential for escalating conflicts, where do you draw the line between offering support and becoming directly involved in another country's war?

 @9LQLD36 from New Mexico  answered…2yrs2Y

I feel like we as country could send money to help aid people in need but i think that getting involved in conflicts that could result in war is pushing us into something were we dont need to be in.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

What are your thoughts on the ethical implications of seizing and transferring assets from one country to benefit another?

 @9LQL97S from Montana  answered…2yrs2Y

My thoughts on the ethical implications of sezing and tranferring assets from one country to benifit another. Russians are going to lose if we go to war, I feel that it cause us as people all around greif, and trauma for some.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you feel about the idea of a country providing financial aid to another country's military efforts?

 @9LQL97S from Montana  answered…2yrs2Y

I feel about a country providing finacial aid to another country's military efforts, isn't a horibble thing. If they have a alanince with another country and the country is in need, might as well help them.

 @RelievedC1v1cDemocratfrom Maine  commented…2yrs2Y

So glad the House has approved aid for Ukraine - better late than never!

The Ukrainians will put the aid to good use - defending their country and destroying the Russian military.

 @EmpathicRightWingRepublican from Florida  commented…2yrs2Y

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that "the new help is unlikely to dramatically reverse Kyiv’s fortunes"

We're giving them $60 billion to not win the war.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe there's ever a justification for one country to provoke or support a civil war in another?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...