@9KWRT944mos4MO
War is inherently unethical. You could argue for either side, really.
@9KWSJD74mos4MO
More ethical. The less human lives lost fighting a rich man’s war, the better.
@9KWRY8GIndependent4mos4MO
no because war is not ethical no matter what
@9KWRTDW4mos4MO
Well, depends on severity and the lengths taken.
@9KWRHYB4mos4MO
Less ethical there will never stop and just keep producing
@9KWRGPY4mos4MO
I believe that robots should be used on both sides, or neither.
@9KWQQBM4mos4MO
Fights/Wars would be robot on robot, there would be no actual fight. If people did fight, they would be crushed as one bullet can kill a human but who knows how many to kill a robot.
@9KWQM7J4mos4MO
I would say adding ground robots would make war less ethical due to the amount of government spending and thousands are getting murdered from a robot.
@9KWPNR74mos4MO
In order to win an agreement a point there has to be something each side has to give in, using robots as replacement of soldiers it will indeed save millions of live however is ethical meaning will be lost.
@9KWP44M4mos4MO
Robots could entirely change our way of war
@9KWN2FX4mos4MO
more ethical. reducing the total number of humans involved in combat
@9KWVHH64mos4MO
I believe that it makes it less ethical, considering these robots aren't real people and aren't fighting for anything in particular.
@9KWTDJV4mos4MO
I believe that humans are just fine!
@9KWT5734mos4MO
I think they would not be any more help than we already have
@9KWSNWF4mos4MO
I think the use of ground robots in combat makes war more ethical.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.