Try the political quiz
@9GJR2LJProgressive Agreements2yrs ago

GMO labels need to be provided to give consumers the option depending on their own needs

In other words, this information should be disclosed as apart of the nutritional value of our food.

5 Replies

 @9GJSPV7Republican from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

Yes, I agree. We should be able to know what we are eating, our children are eating and overall putting in our bodies.

 @9GJTCQV from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

GMO labels need to be shown because even if you have products using ingredients you are okay with, some others may not be.

 @9GJS9LX  from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Just so we know what we’re purchasing and so nobody can cry around later if something happens to their health or body. Bc they knew wtf they was buying

 @9GJSWM9 from Connecticut  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree entirely. I would even take this a step further by making it mandatory for all food suppliers to include warning labels on any ingredients linked to health issues(titanium dioxide, red 40, etc) excluding general ingredients such as salt, sugar, etc

 @9GJSBGB from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree the people should be able to choose what goes into their bodies and have the right to know whats in everything.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

@9GJR2LJ

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias30%Active in
Agreements  1
PartyProgressiveLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…12mos12MO

“Throw out everything you thought you knew about this election.”

By Chuck Todd, NBC News:We are getting awfully close to the moment when it might be fair to say, “Throw out everything you thought you knew about this election.”We are now going from a presidential campaign that left the public disinterested and at times disgusted it to a campaign that I could see generating an electorate that might be as interested, if not more so, as in 2008 and 2020, two of the highest-turnout elections in the last 50 years.If the Democrats do end up with a new nominee — and it’s looking more likely by the hour that they will — that, too, is likely to suddenly trigger interest in what the new nominee has to say, which in turn could engage the electorate in a way that the pre-debate version of this campaign just didn’t.But before we get to this campaign reset, the Democrats have to figure out what their ticket looks like and, more important, how quickly they can get their ticket selected and certified by the party.As of this writing, my sources indicate to me that about the only folks who are still trying to rationalize Biden’s staying in this race all share the last name of Biden, with the possible exception of Biden’s longtime chief political strategist, Mike Donilon — who, as the gatekeeper of the data that makes it to the president's desk, is starting to get blame along with Biden and his family for Democrats’ being in this position.

▲  2015 replies