Currently, police unions are allowed to collectively bargain with government officials over the methods used to hold police officers accountable for misconduct. Proponents argue that collective bargaining stands in the way of accountability. Opponents of limiting collective bargaining argue that more intense criticism of police will disincentivize officers from doing their jobs resulting in crime rates going up.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Voting for candidate:
Zipcode:
@9X8RF8C7mos7MO
Creating independent review boards that handle misconduct cases. These boards would have the authority to investigate allegations and recommend disciplinary actions, while still allowing police unions to have input in the process.
@9V7TBDG8mos8MO
yes, but with careful considerations. Doing so might help to minimize corruption and decrease the ability to transfer police who has multiple misconduct from one police force to the other.
@9BN97GH2yrs2Y
I do not understand this.
I support limitations on the powers of all public unions, especially when it comes to misconduct.
@8ZH49J63yrs3Y
I support limiting all unions' power.
@8SF76Y64yrs4Y
Yes, but only insofar as to promote the enforcement of laws regarding such misconduct.
@8R93HB74yrs4Y
No, but limit the union's power to keep bad cops on the job
@9CKMY422yrs2Y
I believe in police unions but the union should be only a small part of the inquiry into misconduct.
@8ZRVN7JRepublican3yrs3Y
Yes, as I do with all unions.
@9TXQRHP8mos8MO
I mean if needed power I don't think it should be limited because if it's incorrect in someway shape or form and you are trying to figure out a case that's being looked at wrong then i'd say it doesn't need to be limited unless someone is incorrect obviously.
@JaamesWJ3yrs3Y
Yes, but I am generally pro-Union
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
