Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

3.5k Replies

 @jerry9310Libertarian from New York  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence or give out anyone's private information to the public.

 @937SVJYAmerican from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZDVVL6 from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

All speech should be protected by the first amendment and "Hate Speech" is meaningless at that point.

 @8Y5QYVV from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Hate speech is bad when it’s actually hate speech. Now everything is hate speech. It’s gotten ridiculous!

 @9RSBFLCIndependent from California  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

don’t trust government

 @9CL9698 from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, because I don't trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech. Also, hate speech should be protected by the first amendment as long as it does not threaten violence.

 @8SZBT7H from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

Defining and/or prohibiting hate speech is completely out of the government's purview.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...