Try the political quiz
+

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of

271 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

What would you do differently if for one day you held a position of significant political power?

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

Abolish the deep state, fire 85 percent of the federal government, abolish the welfare state, withdraw from all foreign wars, end the fed, return to the gold standard, abolish abortion, restore state's rights, and institute congressional term limits.

 @9K57WHYSocialist  from Oregon  commented…1yr1Y

"Abolish" is strong term. What consequences do you predict from these actions? Do your opinions of what is right for you make it right for everyone?

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…1yr1Y

The consequences of my plan include a return to constitutional, minimal government, the abolition of the Welfare-Warfare Empire of Lies, increased individual liberty, peace, prosperity, Christianity, and free markets. Welcome to the America the Founding Fathers envisioned.

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  commented…7mos7MO

 @B4TMXLT from California  commented…4wks4W

#1 Engaged First Amendment

How can Christianity be involved in the government, when the first amendment states "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion"? That seems to clearly say that the US should have a state religion. Or I could be misunderstanding it, Im not exactly the smartest person in the room normally.

 @7ZNSCC2Libertarian from California  asked…11mos11MO

How do you reconcile the belief that the only sophisticated and highly effective part of the government is secretly trying to undermine you and the rest is incompetent? Have you examined the physiological implications of those beliefs?

 @9J2Z7GT from Louisiana  answered…1yr1Y

Make all colleges the same price and under 10k a year in total cost.

 @9J488FWIndependent from Indiana  agreed…1yr1Y

I don't know if this would be appropriate for private colleges. But, maybe put a cap on tuition for publicly funded schools and other costs like books and supplies. Higher education costs are in a runaway. Everyone deserves to better themselves.

 @9J2Z8KSDemocrat from Nevada  answered…1yr1Y

If someday I held significant political power, I would make sure that everyone is treated with equality and respect, I would also focus on gun control and women's rights.

 @9J3B4WK from Georgia  agreed…1yr1Y

Those three issues mentioned in the response are some of the most talked about issues in America. Personally, I feel as though they are the issues in the need of improving on the most.

 @9J2YWX9 from Oklahoma  answered…1yr1Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Why do you think it's important, or not, for individuals to debate and discuss politics openly?

 @9JB4QNB from Virginia  commented…1yr1Y

It's important to not debate because a person's point of view might differ from another person's

 @9JB8R2J from New Hampshire  answered…1yr1Y

I think its important to disscus politics openly because it gives other people to express there opions and maybe we can learn fomr other people.

 @9JB7TZ2 from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

We need to have political participation or else we lose/forget the rights of the people.

 @9JB9QWQ from Wisconsin  answered…1yr1Y

It gives ideas to different people to see different points of view. I don't care much about it but the people that do find it important, which is why I think it is important.

 @9DRRZJZ from Alaska  commented…2yrs2Y

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote! (Ben Franklin quote)

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Democracy could also just as easily be two sheep and a wolf, or three sheep, or three wolves, so this argument is a stupid assumption to begin with.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…1yr1Y

Well you're the stupid expert here not me

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  commented…1yr1Y

I have seen my fair share, yes. It's what happens when you're right all the time, not that I expect you to understand...

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…1yr1Y

That was a sad attempt at a shoot-back. Claiming to be right all the time? How arrogant of you. I myself have changed my mind on a number of political things – I used to be an interventionist, now I'm an isolationism; I used to be a nationalist, now I'm a States' Rights believer; I used to be a protectionist, now I believe in free trade. I'm the one with the open mind here.

  @DanielKolbin1105Independent  from Indiana  commented…2yrs2Y

Why can't the lamb get his two friends to vote :)

(Also, Benjamin Franklin probably didn't say that.)

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

If freedom of speech is crucial in a democracy, where should we draw the line when it comes to hate speech and misinformation?

 @9HCRHLB from Utah  answered…1yr1Y

If the speech is directly threatening someone or something, I think it can be considered hate speech. Misinformation can be drawn when it is directly opposite of what the government is stating.

 @9KN8DG6 from Utah  disagreed…1yr1Y

Misinformation can be drawn when it is directly opposite of what the government is stating

So if it goes against government its wrong. For some reason that doesn't sound right

  @@1876-Elbert from Colorado  commented…6mos6MO

So, for example, if the govt. is saying 'abortion is good!' but I, as a Christian, know this is false, I can't say anything about it? Terrifying.

 @9HCS26S from New York  answered…1yr1Y

 @9HCRLZ5 from Utah  answered…1yr1Y

When people are lying about threats others have done or things that may harm people. When you feel unsafe around them.

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  commented…7mos7MO

Hate speech should never be protected under any circumstance. You shouldn't have the right to make someone else's life miserable.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

What's the most important quality you look for in a candidate when voting, and how does that reflect your values?

 @9HZ2J83Democrat from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Competency and ensuring freedom and basic american ideals. I want a candidate that, especially in these times, will be willing to protect liberty for not just Americans but our allies and partners.

 @9HZJM7B  from Kentucky  answered…1yr1Y

 @9HZ2KW4 from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Intelligence and those who share a majority of my views. This is pretty important considering it is an important quality.

 @9HTRXDR from California  commented…1yr1Y

I look for honesty, morality, and intelligence in a candidate since it lets us know they're aware of what they're job is and how to protect our country.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you think society would change if everyone could directly vote on major decisions instead of electing representatives?

 @9H2T36CIndependent from Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

i believe we would get a wide variety of answers that may be completely misinformed or too egregious to actually put in place

 @9H2T5NGGreen from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

I think the results would be vastly different to the society we have today becuase choices would actually be made on a popular vote.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

I think it would be horrible. The man-made political "law" would be flimsy and constantly changing, even more impossible to understand than it is today. The 50.1% would vote to deny the rights of the 49.9% with impunity.

 @9H2SJ4GRepublicanfrom Virgin Islands  answered…2yrs2Y

It would be real bloody democracy then, instead of the oligarchy we have going on.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

If you could create a new political party, what would be its main value or policy, and why?

 @9HZ2SX3 from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

my main policy or value would be focusing on are ecosystem. Are Ozone is withering majoriy of the wild animals are dying off due to humans expanding and taking over more land for housing weather its for living or farming and live stock, feeding people and anything like that and also all the mechanics pumping crap into are air and the trees being cut down so air quality is worsening. The Coral reefs dying and bleaching from global warming. The Scientists need more funding and need more spotlight the world needs to take a turn in caring about are world.

 @9HZ2DW8 from Kentucky  answered…1yr1Y

 @9HZ2D99Republican from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If democracy is 'rule by the people,' what do you think should be done about those who choose not to participate in the political process?

 @Name-IrrelevantConstitution  from West Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

The purpose of democracy is to ensure the rights of common people. If a common person chooses not to participate, that's within their rights. Let them sit it out. Part of "rule by the people" involves allowing the people to abstain from ruling, just as our elected officials can abstain from voting.

 @9HYQJ4N from Maryland  agreed…1yr1Y

The whole point of a Democracy is to ensure the rights on the common people, if the common person has decided they do not want to participate than it is well within there personal rights according to our democracy to abstain from ruling.

 @9H9FX6T from Arizona  answered…1yr1Y

It is their choice to participate or not. I just hope those who don't participate are willing to admit they didn't participate when they are complaining about who the current elected officials are.

 @9H9GH3Z from Connecticut  answered…1yr1Y

 @9H9JYSJDemocrat from Maine  answered…1yr1Y

They should have to live with the results and be further encouraged to participate.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

In a democracy, should the needs of the many always outweigh the needs of the few, and why?

 @9HTS6YN from South Carolina  commented…1yr1Y

I think the needs of many outweighs the needs of few because they're a lot of people in American and you want to benefit as many as possible.

 @9HZ2PFX from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, the helping the needs of many provides help for many more people than the needs of the few.

 @9HZ3Z35 from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

While it depends because I think that everyone has rights to stand up for what they think and believe in and we all should be equal and have freedom.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How would society be impacted if only those who contributed to discussions and civic activities were allowed to vote?

 @9HDLNB8 from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

there would be a lot more good and bad choices made and honestly maybe for better or worse because they spend less time trying to convince the masses and more time on better ideas

 @9HDLGVQ from Indiana  answered…1yr1Y

I think society would be positively impacted. Many politicians rely on ignorance to get votes.

 @9HDLH75 from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

 @9HDLVZRRepublican from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

There would be less Democracy and less say-so among the people because only a few citizens would be able to represent their opinions.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How do you think mandatory civic education in schools would shape the future of democracy?

 @9HZ2PS7Green from Nebraska  answered…1yr1Y

More people will be inclined to vote, and they will be able to make more educated decisions when it comes to choosing leaders.

 @9HZ2MD6 from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

What role do you believe emotions should play in democratic decision-making?

 @9J563M8 from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

 @9J5625F from California  answered…1yr1Y

I believe in our democracy beliefs based on religion shouldn't indicate decisions in our democracy.

 @B4TMXLT from California  answered…4wks4W

Emotion isnt logical, its based on internalized beliefs that might be completely and blatently wrong and even ignore reason and evidence. Logic and reasoning should be the only major deciding factors in decision making regarding voting.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Have you ever had a conversation about politics change your mind, and how did it impact your view on democracy?

 @9HZ3BRB from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

If you could ask one question to a political leader and get an honest answer, what would it be?

 @9HH3FPY from California  commented…1yr1Y

I would ask the political leader, "are you a leader for others or a leader for yourself?".

 @9HMLHS6 from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How can individuals without political power make a difference in a democratic society?

 @9HZ3HLQ from Tennessee  answered…1yr1Y

Individuals without the right to vote can still make their opinions known through protest or other forms of free speech.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How do you think historical figures who fought for democracy would view our modern democratic society?

 @9JBL2HD from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

I think they would be disappointed in one of our two major parties being led and followed by nazi fascists.

  @@1876-Elbert from Colorado  commented…6mos6MO

 @9T5WBNK from Pennsylvania  answered…8mos8MO

Those who fought for true democracy have always looked upon the American representative "Democracy" with disgust

  @@1876-Elbert from Colorado  answered…6mos6MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Should voting be mandatory to ensure everyone's voice is heard in a democracy, or should it remain a choice?

 @9H2TDBM from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

It should remain a choice because not everyone has access to the ID's or proof of person they would need to be able to vote.

 @9H2T5NGGreen from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

the result mandatory voting would be interesting, I belive it would be hard to enforce and costly.

 @B4TMXLT  from California  answered…4wks4W

I think it should be mandatory to mail in a ballot or vote in booths, but that there should be an option to have your vote not be counted.

This would make sure that people who might otherwise not vote would vote, making the actual count of the votes more accurate to what the people want.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

If a policy you strongly disagree with was democratically decided, how would you respond or take action?

  @8YB3Z64Libertarian from Texas  answered…10mos10MO

Try to get it democratically overturned. One of the great things about Democracy, is that nothing is set in stone.

  @@1876-Elbert from Colorado  answered…6mos6MO

Show people why it is wrong, such as what I have done with abortion and the like.

Considering the fact that it is legal in my home state of Colorado, I have experience.

 @9HH7KQC from Maryland  commented…1yr1Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How would you act if you were in charge of writing a new constitution for your country today?

 @9J4RTBP from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

I would be sure to include that ANYONE impeached from an office is not re-electable, nor those committing any crime, especially ones against their own country.

  @@1876-Elbert from Colorado  answered…6mos6MO

I would base it almost entirely upon the Bible.

 @B4TMXLT  from California  disagreed…4wks4W

I believe you are from the US since you answered from colorado, why are you ignoring the first amendment? The first amendmant states that "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion" making it clear the founding fathers did not want the US to become a theocracy. Or do you believe the founding fathers wants and the first amendmant should be ignored?

  @8YB3Z64Libertarian from Texas  answered…10mos10MO

Resign from the position. I don't want that much Power. However, if it was forced on me, I would try to have it represent what as many as possible want.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Do you think having a wide variety of news sources helps or harms our understanding of democratic issues?

 @9HLYPYM from Louisiana  answered…1yr1Y

Helps our understanding because this allows people to get more than one side and not be biased

 @9HLXMQT from New Hampshire  answered…1yr1Y

I think they are equal, and that misinformation can destroy our coherent thoughts and make us think against each other.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How does your personal belief in equality influence your view on policies that prioritize majority rule over minority rights?

 @9HD3XVHfrom Florida  answered…1yr1Y

I think it's ok that they do this since it will make make most people happy, instead of making most people sad.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Have you ever changed your mind on an important issue after a discussion, and how did it affect your views on democracy?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How would you feel if the voting age was lowered, allowing teenagers to participate in elections?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...