These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of
These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of
@9HCRHLB2yrs2Y
If the speech is directly threatening someone or something, I think it can be considered hate speech. Misinformation can be drawn when it is directly opposite of what the government is stating.
@9KN8DG61yr1Y
“Misinformation can be drawn when it is directly opposite of what the government is stating”
So if it goes against government its wrong. For some reason that doesn't sound right
@@1876-Elbert7mos7MO
So, for example, if the govt. is saying 'abortion is good!' but I, as a Christian, know this is false, I can't say anything about it? Terrifying.
@9HCS26S2yrs2Y
Speech is fine until it activately calls for physical harm
@9HCRLZ52yrs2Y
When people are lying about threats others have done or things that may harm people. When you feel unsafe around them.
@Renaldo-MoonGreen 8mos8MO
Hate speech should never be protected under any circumstance. You shouldn't have the right to make someone else's life miserable.
many do not like the truth freedom of speech should still be allowed and when it comes to hate speech they should be stopped but you need to hear the people out and if they have a good reason something should be changed but if there isn't that will continue to happen but don't use force
@@1876-Elbert7mos7MO
'Yes, but...' Terrible. Free speech is free speech, there is no 'line.'
Join in on more popular conversations.
