Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

7.4k Replies

 @7YS3KJPIndependent  from Arizona  answered…7mos7MO

No; we do not have either the state or government resources necessary to properly implement such a solution. However, funding for rehabilitation centers should be increased and drug abuse should be treated as a health issue first.

 @9Y7V9M5 from Florida  answered…8mos8MO

Ye but to an extent, treat drug addiction as a health issue and use the professional help to ween them off of the drugs their addicted to

 @9VYPT86  from Indiana  answered…8mos8MO

This alone does not solve the root issue, they need to be supported not in using drugs but also in getting a job or home and rehabilitation. Maybe they use drugs supervised for a while, but giving them hope is what is most important in changing their addiction. Otherwise this “safe haven” doesn’t work and wastes resources.

 @9XJVRTWProgressive from Missouri  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, but these should be separate from the public. Any public intoxication that is deemed a nuisance should result in mandatory rehabilitation.

 @7YS3KJPIndependent  from Arizona  answered…8mos8MO

I understand the justification behind the idea, but there are large-scale logistical and funding problems that would make this very difficult to implement successfully in the US - and I think we’ve seen some of that in the cities that have tried it. I would increase funding for rehabilitation centers, support the institution of quality control measures to prevent unscientific treatments from creeping in, and lower the classifications of certain drugs and prison sentences for possessing them.

 @9V2QHW9  from Texas  answered…9mos9MO

This idea could be blended into traditional rehab centers to help patients come off the drug they are addicted to by slowly lowering the dose they are taking.

 @9V2JJF5 from Kansas  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, this will reduce the drug overdose death rate and it should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue.

 @7MG7ZB2Libertarian from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but increase funding for rehabilitation centers and decriminalize addiction.

 @8XM9TSTDemocrat from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only if they participate in a mandatory, strict, and thorough rehabilitation treatment program in which they must end their addiction or be placed into a mental institution until their addiction is ended.

 @7YS3KJPIndependent from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but I would increase funding for rehabilitation centers, support the institution of quality control measures to prevent unscientific treatments from creeping in, and lower the classifications of certain drugs and prison sentences for possessing them.

 @99BXTH2 from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but the "safe havens" should be connected to enhanced rehabilitation facilities to better the lives of those who are addicted

 @986YR5TPeace and Freedom from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, drug use is a medical and health issue, and these heavens should also try to rehabilitate the people as well.

 @obnoxiously-moderate from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

No, cities should open drug "keeps" where users cannot leave but can choose between having as much drugs as they want or graduating from an onsite rehabilitation program.

 @932V85R from Nevada  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9XKJ2TX from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

I believe this is the first step to a safer drug wise world. We need to allow people who are addicted now to be treated without criminal persucution, (except in the more extreme cases, like those that end with rape or murder) as it can then change the conversation. Addicts wouldnt be scared and can get more help and even more importantly, ASK FOR HELP.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...