In 2018, officials in the U.S. city of Philadelphia city proposed opening a “safe haven” in an effort to combat the city's heroin epidemic. In 2016 64,070 people died in the U.S. from drug overdoses - a 21% increase from 2015. 3/4 of drug overdose deaths in the U.S. are caused by the opioid class of drugs which includes prescription painkillers, heroin and fentanyl. To combat the epidemic cities including Vancouver, BC and Sydney, AUS opened safe havens where addicts can inject drugs under the supervision of medical professionals. The safe havens reduce the overdose death rate by insuring the addicted patients are given drugs that are not contaminated or poisoned. Since 2001 5,900 people have overdosed at a safe haven in Sydney, Australia but no one has died. Proponents argue that the safe havens are the only proven solution to lower the overdose fatality rate and prevent the spread of diseases like HIV-AIDS. Opponents argue that safe havens may encourage illegal drug use and re-direct funding from traditional treatment centers.
Yes because drug absue should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue. Supervised drug use and controlling the frequency of usage can help diminish and eliminate the use of said drug, everyone progresses through the process of recovery differently
Yes, drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue, however rehab should be heavily advertised and information should be gathered (where they are getting the drugs, how they are getting them ,etc.)
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion