Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

18.3k Replies

 @9DR8VQJ from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

I feel like Public transportation should be free for some people, mainly because some people can't really afford it.

 @9DHM9ZQ from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and look into finding cheaper, more efficient alternatives to air travel

 @PKhaos  from South Dakota  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but it is the duty of local governance to provide such services. Federal funding should be handled as infrastructure payments to states to be distributed to local communities.

 @9DHR979 from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, with a special focus on Amtrak and public train travel across the country.

 @9BKHWCY from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9429HXM from South Dakota  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if the money is used to create bullet trains that connect major cities

 @8ZKK9VY from South Dakota  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but there should be more free and easily accessed public transportation.

 @8YRHNP3 from South Dakota  answered…3yrs3Y

If people got work and school and they don't got a lot of money they should be able to get a ride to work to get enough money to pay but no they shouldn't people wouldn't like that.

 @8XXMN2VWorkers from South Dakota  answered…3yrs3Y

I do think that if there were a larger quantity of buses and safety precautions on these subjects that there would be a cleaner environment as well as disperse in population.

 @8WJ2MJP from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VDRW57 from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, make every road "what your most comfortable with" leaving everything up to you but dont go like 100.

 @8SRKYK3Republican from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RDCRK7 from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RD5NVD from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes if theyre more economically friendly than people driving their private cars. Also people who dont have cars need transportation!

 @8R947NJ from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

yes, spending goes to environmentally friendly solutions, and provide more free public transportation

 @8QG6MW9 from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PSB69G from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8MMBQ88 from South Dakota  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8D88WW9Libertarian from South Dakota  answered…5yrs5Y

No, Public transportation should be decided by the local and/or state government via public voting initiatives.

 @9B3X9X5 from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

There is no public transportation where I live in order to have an opinion on this

 @99F4XL3 from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but prioritize free and environmentally friendly solutions simultaneously.

 @98D6H6N from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if it is used responsibly and in a way that is more beneficial than harmful

 @8RPFN3C from South Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

I love the environmental friendliness issues but has many issues with costs.

 @8MQX6FHRepublican from South Dakota  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8JWBR54 from South Dakota  answered…5yrs5Y

We should prioritize things and areas in order to save money but keep our same amount of transportation money.

 @97MD2MS from South Dakota  answered…3yrs3Y

The government should increase the amount of spending on public transportation ONLY if the people using them respect it. So this means no vandalism or destruction of property. If they choose to do so then they will serve time in jail and have a fine to pay.

 @9BFLLWN from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that would be great but I think instead of making more and bigger roads they should invent new and make more vehicles to help along the travel and make it more environmentally friendly.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...