Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

14.9k Replies

 @B44Z98T from California  answered…3mos3MO

There should be a separate voting system that allocates for all the different counties in each state to tally up the votes instead of using either the popular or electoral college vote.

 @9ZHLNHX from California  answered…7mos7MO

I don't think we should abolish the Electoral College. This could cause dissension among populations who have already gotten used to it. It's also much easier to understand. Perhaps updating populations could also help.

 @9TWKMXJ from California  answered…9mos9MO

Make it so that the amount of votes given to a candidate by each state is proportional to the percentage of people in the state who voted for that candidate: if 10% of a state voted for a candidate and the state has 10 Electoral votes, that candidate should receive 1 vote from the state.

 @9S76KH6 from California  answered…10mos10MO

I don’t think the electoral college should be abolished, but if a candidate fails to reach 270 electoral votes, then the winner should be determined who finished with the highest popular vote, not the House in each state having one vote to determine the winner.

 @93CK2ST from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YC78CH from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XTGGHL from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No. If the electoral college were abolished, that would basically be abolishing the constitution.

 @8XJVV5X from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, we should switch to the most fair practice and decide what that is as a society together.

 @8VRW4FY from California  answered…4yrs4Y

It shouldn't be abolished but it should be held as a secondary element when considering presidency, the primary piece of winning presidency should come from the vote of the people.

 @8TTW2Y3 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T6PXP5 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RGB5PC from California  answered…4yrs4Y

I am actually not aware of what this means, therefore i don't think it would be appropriate to give an uneducated answer.

 @8Q5PJHV from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the electoral college eliminates the possibility for a third party to win the presidency with a low percentage majority

 @8P8GTSJ from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8NPB7W7 from California  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but the popular vote and disrict system seems very biased because the politicians can draw district lines, so does it even matter if we have districts if they can be changed whenever a politician sees an advantage that would come from changing the area.

 @8HNSM7N from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8H4BFCT from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, because they just vote for the most popular candidate in their state anyway so what's the point of having them.

 @8D9XF6C from California  answered…5yrs5Y

We should incorporate the electoral college, popular vote, as well as another ranking system.

 @8CRPHZW from California  answered…5yrs5Y

It needs reform, end winner take all and ensure distribution is based on a set value(i.e 1 electoral vote per 200,000 people.)

 @97MT4GD from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VR8Y7X from California  answered…4yrs4Y

The electoral college shouldn't be abolished but it should be secondary to the vote of the people

 @8TD8NSRPopulist from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8M7LV2S from California  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but reform it so that the votes are distributed proportionally instead and have the electoral point value of each state updated by population every census

 @8FZ2C6K from California  answered…5yrs5Y

First we need to end gerrymandering and voter suppression. If that doesn't work then we need to fix the electoral college.

 @8X8FW3X from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Don't abolish the electoral college, but reform the primary system to be ranked-choice voting.