Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Mandatory Vaccinations

38.8k Replies

 @8N9TD8KPeace and Freedom from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9DFRPX4Peace and Freedom from Kentucky  answered…2yrs2Y

It depends on the age of the child. it shouldn't be regulated by the government and parents should have a say, but the children themself once they reach the proper age, should have a say.

 @966ZNK8Peace and Freedom from South Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9YCWHFJPeace and Freedom from Utah  answered…7mos7MO

No, It should be the parents' decisions to do so, but it should be required to attend public school and awareness of the risks should be spread.

 @9YCHW5ZPeace and Freedom from Iowa  answered…7mos7MO

Covid no! But like the middle school shots yes but if they don't get them they should still be allowed to go to school and later they can get them!

 @9Y6KRSMPeace and Freedom from Pennsylvania  answered…7mos7MO

if they really need it yes but the government shouldn't force vaccines on children if they don't want to

 @9Y6JHZXPeace and Freedom from Michigan  answered…7mos7MO

I think it should be up to the parents what they think the best thing is for their child. But I think some vaccines should be pushed for deadly and very contagious diseases.

 @9Y22Y6BPeace and Freedom from Texas  answered…7mos7MO

depends on the vaccine, I don't want my child to react badly to the vaccines and I think it's the same for a lot of mothers around the world.

 @9XX42BVPeace and Freedom from Missouri  answered…7mos7MO

I think any vaccines should be up to the parents and the kid (if old enough) due to all the risks that many of them have. They should not require vaccines to be able to go to school for many different reasons.

 @9XWHT7NPeace and Freedom from Utah  answered…7mos7MO

until they turn 18 the choice is left to there parent/guardian but those who have not be vaccinated should be kept separate from those who have.

 @9XB7Y72Peace and Freedom from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

50% no becasue that vaccine could hurt the kids even more. 50% yes if it work and help the children.

 @9X4QR95Peace and Freedom from North Dakota  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases, require vaccination in order to attend public schools, and hold the parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children.

 @9WS7HJDPeace and Freedom from Kentucky  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, Only for deadly and contagious diseases while making exceptions to those with beliefs that forbid vaccine

 @9WQ9HGHPeace and Freedom from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

This also depends on how dangerous it is to go outside without vaccinated, not matter how young or old you are.

 @9WLZNCXPeace and Freedom from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

Children of all ethnicities and age, are the future of our race. Without children, humanity will perish. It is absolutely imperative that we protect and care for the children all over the world.

 @9WJGMNWPeace and Freedom from New York  answered…8mos8MO

Educate parents about the importance, the benefits and the pros and cons of vaccinating the children and let the parents decide whether they want to or not.

 @9W3W4QVPeace and Freedom from Idaho  answered…8mos8MO

I think that everyone should be able to decide if they get vacined if it is a sickness that doesn't spread to easily if it spreads easily then people should get vacinated

 @9VPKDJ8Peace and Freedom from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

I think that depends on whether or not the vaccine even works, because the Cocid vaccine didn't even work.

 @9VN5X38Peace and Freedom from Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

it depends on the situation, doctors can try to add bad things, you don't even know if the diseases is deadly.

 @9VHZRB5Peace and Freedom from Kentucky  answered…9mos9MO

The parents should have the last decision on any medical procedure done to their children not the government.

 @9V5XM8BPeace and Freedom from Louisiana  answered…9mos9MO

If there is no medical reason for children to not be vaccinated they should be, if they are homeschooled or go to a school against those beliefs, they should have a specialist and not come in contact with elders and infants.

 @9TX85Z3Peace and Freedom from Iowa  answered…9mos9MO

its the parent's choice whether to vaccinate their kids or not but it should be considered or at least enforced when it comes to more contagious or deadly diseases

 @9TR3Y4HPeace and Freedom from California  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, as long as the vaccines are soundly backed by science, not rushed for economic purposes (don't want repeat of questionable COVID vaccines)

 @9TP43S4Peace and Freedom from Oregon  answered…9mos9MO

Depends should ask the parents if they want it for there kid then yeah go for it if they don’t they don’t deal with it it is a right and they’ll be dying not you who got the vac

 @9TJ5Y42Peace and Freedom from Alabama  answered…9mos9MO

I feel like it depends on the disease, how much money we have to spend on vaccines, and what the parents of the children think

 @9SQZ2Q8Peace and Freedom from Ohio  answered…10mos10MO

Vaccines should be required but a list of ingredients for the vaccine should be provided to parents if they ask for it

 @9SNC65RPeace and Freedom from Ohio  answered…10mos10MO

Should be up to the parents to decide what they want to do with their kid. It is hard to force people to get their kids to vaccinate even though it is the right thing to do.

 @9SFWXZPPeace and Freedom  from California  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, it should be required for deadly contagious diseases, but with exceptions for religion beliefs and medical conditions.

 @9RY4WM2Peace and Freedom from New Hampshire  answered…10mos10MO

No, but a deep look into every vaccine should be taken, studied, and the findings shared for risk assessment and effectiveness’s before giving vaccines. Parents should then be held liable for transmissions of diseases.

 @9RCRFFGPeace and Freedomfrom Maine  answered…11mos11MO

No one should be forced into vaccination, it is the parents responsibility and choice to vaccinate their child.

 @9LQYNCLPeace and Freedom from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

I think it should be required, however if there are medical reasons why they can't get the vaccine it shouldn't be required.

 @9LNP9HQPeace and Freedom from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

I think that if you want to get it get it because you dont want it spreading to other people because someone cant force you to get it unless you want too

 @9LHWVXCPeace and Freedom from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

I think it shoudn't be required by law, however it should be required to attend public schools, and if you cause someone else to die from a disease transferred to them because your child isn't vaccinated it should be tried as murder.

 @9L2GQTBPeace and Freedom from Kansas  answered…1yr1Y

I believe they should explain on what is in it and what it does and give the parents a choice to get the vaccine or not.

 @9L2CF9CPeace and Freedomanswered…1yr1Y

People should be allowed to choose what they think is best for their children, however if their child continues to become sick then it should be looked into.

 @9KM84C9Peace and Freedom from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

yes and no if the vaccine is safe yes or if its preventable without a vaccine like boosting your immune system. Than if it is dangerous no preventing it yes and if its not safe pretty much the opposite.

 @9KL7KJ3Peace and Freedom from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if vaccines have a tolerable success rate. Then the rest be optional/for states to decide.

 @9KKBLKZPeace and Freedom from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

yes kids should get vaccinated but parents shouldn't be forest to give kids certain vaccines because a lot of vaccines can cause a lot of health risk .

 @9K5NRZRPeace and Freedom from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

For the most part yes, unless of course some are allergic to it, the vaccination hasn't been properly tested, and if the vaccination causes really bad side affects especially ones that don't go away and or effect ones organs.

 @9K55KT3Peace and Freedom from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only for serious issues and with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid the use of vaccines.

 @9JTDFZBPeace and Freedom from Wyoming  answered…1yr1Y

It should be up to the parents and even up to the kid in they are old enough to make their own decisions.

 @9JRQDWRPeace and Freedom from South Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but it should only be for diseases that can affect a whole community. previous to their kids being vaccinated they should have a long list of information on the vaccine.

 @9JK6LY8Peace and Freedom from Colorado  answered…1yr1Y

With essential vaccines to be able to live, yes I think it's required since I would not advocate the death of a child. But with vaccines that are controversial like the covid vaccine, I think you should be able to choose and it shouldn't be restricted.

 @9JF92TPPeace and Freedom from Alabama  answered…1yr1Y

I feel like people shouldn't be forced to take a vaccination shot. We should be able to agree and disagree with what we will and won't take. There are other ways to prevent a disease other than getting Vaccinated.

 @9JCH3NBPeace and Freedomanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if they don't have any health problems that will be affected by the vaccination because the whole point of the vaccination is to keep the children healthy and safe.

 @9JB96NJPeace and Freedom from New Jersey  answered…1yr1Y

No but they should be fully educated on the risks if not and be willing to shelter their child in certain circumstances for the protection of others, and others should be made aware that they are not vaccinated

 @9HWRK6KPeace and Freedom from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

I do not think the government should be involved but I do think parents should be taught the benefits and the risks to make their own choice for their children.

 @9HC2P4WPeace and Freedom from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

the families should be able to choose, but properties should be able to reject them if they are not vaccinated, such as schools, jobs, traveling, etc. to prevent spread of infectious disease.

 @9H2NDYPPeace and Freedom from California  answered…2yrs2Y

This should all be dependent on the guardians of the children no one should be able to tell you what to do with your kids but some vaccinations are important for everyone and not just children.

 @9GX8Y3BPeace and Freedom from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

It's important that people are vaccinated to prevent disease, but you can't force anyone to do something they don't want to do. Instead, trying to implement quarantine to prevent it from spreading if that person is presumed to have a contagious disease seems more reasonable

 @9GR52PGPeace and Freedom from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes and No, it should not be required only under the will of the child and parent if they want their child to be vaccinated.

 @9GQRHWKPeace and Freedom from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious belief forbid use of vaccines and those that have allergies. And if its required then it must be provided

 @9GPZL2QPeace and Freedom from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Only vaccine that have been fully heavily tested and if the parents don't want to the kid cannot attend school

 @9GNMT3SPeace and Freedom from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

i feel like you should make your own choices, as every single action you take will have consequences

 @9GC5L2MPeace and Freedom from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but with the combination of only for deadly diseases, and choice depending on religion, and public places recommend not force the vaccine.

 @9G8LSRQPeace and Freedom  from Hawaii  answered…2yrs2Y

Parents and their children should be able to make a decision because it is a possibility that a vaccination could be deadly to the children.

 @9FZDQJFPeace and Freedom from California  answered…2yrs2Y

They should only be given the minimum, with the consent of their parents and the doctors should be properly educated to know whats being injected. This should be told to the legal guardian prior to injections.

 @9FV8WD8Peace and Freedom from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

yes and no. yes becuse we what kids to be safe. no becuse is too dangerous for kids and some may die.

 @9FQ8BT7Peace and Freedom from Hawaii  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but with exceptions of personal choice. If you are not vaccinated then they are not allowed to be in school with the rest of the vaccinated children.

 @9FNJCXQPeace and Freedom from Northern Mariana Islands  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FJ3W8RPeace and Freedom from Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

maybe depending on how bad the decease is but also the vaccine have to be proven to work without any side effect

 @9F9MXHYPeace and Freedom from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F8WRKYPeace and Freedom from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Only if the parents know of all the side effects and what the vaccination is for.

 @9F5KHSCPeace and Freedom from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

it shouldnt be illegal to not vaccinate, especially due to religious beliefs but it is important to be educated on it

 @9DZ3HT7Peace and Freedom from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but allow the children's parent or guardian decide rather than get the government involved.

 @9DYHMYZPeace and Freedom from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

yes but only for the dangerous and deadly diseases. exceptions for people with religious beliefs that may not allow vaccines

 @9DS8HNFPeace and Freedom from Alabama  answered…2yrs2Y

I feel like it should be a choice for the child at an older age. So they can process it the vaccination and disease for themself without bias and can choose for themselves.

 @9DQ75KSPeace and Freedom from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

No, people should be able to decide on their own. unless it is a deadly or extremely harmful disease to others.

 @8N6H8RYPeace and Freedom from Tennessee  answered…5yrs5Y

Children should be able to choose when they are able but when they are little the parents should make the decision.

 @9GGHFKNPeace and Freedom from South Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, this should be left for the parents to decide. People who are uncomfortable with the idea of getting a new vaccine have the right to forbid it as well as their children

 @9BYYQYXPeace and Freedom from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

i feel like they should have to be vaccinatede unless they have a health issue that they arent able to have the vaccination

  @AvatarMaryPeace and Freedom from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99YCJQBPeace and Freedom from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99XG3GVPeace and Freedom from Iowa  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but there should be allowences for those who are allergic or have conflicting medical ailments

 @99X94J2Peace and Freedom from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @994RKSYPeace and Freedom from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96SGTZ4Peace and Freedom from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

If the child is under the age of consent, then it should be up to the parents whether or not their children get vaccinated.

 @96MW59NPeace and Freedom from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

I think Yes and no because I think people should be able to choose if they want to get vaccinated or not. Plus some people die from them but at the same time, it can be helpful to keep people safe.

 @96HFXB4Peace and Freedom from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @96H8GD8Peace and Freedom from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes for deadly diseases unless they have a valid reason or religious beliefs

 @96FVN9KPeace and Freedom from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

I think vaccination is a choice, but it is important to have some form of protection against diseases like that.

 @9694RFNPeace and Freedom from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

yes if its for chicken pox and stuff but covid i highly disagree and it should be the childs or parents choice

 @966FBGTPeace and Freedom from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @966C8Q9Peace and Freedom from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

 @965TF4XPeace and Freedom from North Dakota  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, except when the child is unable to receive that vaccine because of a medical issue.