Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

1.7k Replies

 @9L3PV69 from California  answered…1yr1Y

people should not be limited. corporations should. people are citizens with constitutional (first amendment) rights. corporations are not.

 @9D8V3VM from California  answered…2yrs2Y

The ability to support a candidate, financially, or otherwise, is a difficult question because of the question of bribery and influence peddling The ability to support a candidate, financially, or otherwise, is a difficult question because of the question of bribery and influence peddling

 @987KGHYGreen from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and governments should hold publicly funded and managed debates and public information distribution to support intelligence informed elections.

 @B27RBT7 from California  answered…5mos5MO

Citizens United should be overturned. Elections should be publicly funded. But yes, politicians shouldn't be bought by wealthy donors.

 @9JLJF2D from California  answered…1yr1Y

Yes. Donations should be severely curtailed and all donors should be citizens (natural-born or naturalized) and should be natural persons (no corporations or PACs should be allowed to donate in any fashion)

 @9CDGDNX from California  answered…2yrs2Y

no, but make people who have more than .25% of GDP as net worth give the rest to the government

 @93CP2FRLibertarian from California  answered…3yrs3Y

YES, and all donations should be public knowledge. Politicians should become politicians because they want to help their communities and their country, not to make money by being sponsored or bought.

 @8ZRK6YT from California  answered…3yrs3Y

It doesn't make any difference. The United States is not a Democratic Republic but a dictatorship.

 @8Z3H2HR from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Personally, I think candidates should not have to ask the public for funding or donations. Candidates should be prepared with their own money.

 @8VNWZCLDemocrat from California  answered…4yrs4Y

ban all pac money or political action committees or any synomis committies.

 @8TB5WBZ from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Make it affordable to run for office to the point donations shouldn’t be needed.

 @8QZP68R from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8Q9Y3LJ from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8MRXKQX from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8LMJ7HYLibertarian from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes and this should include disclosure of all Super Pac donations and the Super Pacs should have to disclose full information.

 @8J62LTG from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Political Donations should be required to be spent in the community instead of on advertising. Advertising should consist of debates, Town Halls, and news coverage.

 @8D9CKRL from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Every citizen should have a government-allocated amount to donate to candidates for better representation

 @9BK5ZGL from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No, don't put a limit on the amount able to be received but, only allow candidates to spend "x" amount per election season.

 @99VHTT5 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99GX56MRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Ban small donors from politics. There should be a minimum limit, not a maximum limit to donating.

 @8PXNGGRSocialist from California  answered…3yrs3Y

ban poltiical donations, and isnittue a patriot card for everyone, to publcily fund elections.

 @93LH6GZ from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, an individual citizen should be allowed to donate but Super PACs should be banned.

 @8FRXJGN from California  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but ban political donations from non-US citizen people and entities

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...