Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 枪支管制
8>8 Personal answerNo but actually ENFORCE the laws on the books & quit legislating from the bench/activist DA offices |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
8>8 Personal answerHave designated teachers that are "marshalls" that feel secure with firearms & go thru regular handling/situational training. |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
8>8 Personal answer不 |
教育 › Free College for All
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Supreme Court Reform
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answerQuit pussyfooting around the platform vs publisher designation. Quit letting them have it both ways |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
8>8 Personal answerWhat does it matter...the goalposts will just be moved to support the prevailing "definition" of vaccine |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo opinion. Need more info |
罪行 › Qualified Immunity for Police
8>8 Personal answerTo nuanced of a question |
环境 › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 安全空间
8>8 Personal answerI hope the whole.instution collapses |
国内政策 › 爱国者法案
8>8 Personal answerNot anymore. It was supposed to be a temporary measure and has become permanent. Slippery slope |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 北约
8>8 Personal answerNo, not until other countries increase their financial contributions |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › Medicaid Work Requirement
8>8 Personal answerYes if they are able and curb all the disability loopholes. Current system is unstainable |
国内政策 › Congressional ban on stock trading
8>8 Personal answerNo, and their investments should be held in a blind trust |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
8>8 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answerNo. See San Fransisco - Exhinit A - Z |
医保 › Medicare Drug Prices
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
移民 › 州内学费
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 奥巴马医改
8>8 Personal answerNo. Get rid of the barriers for competition and let the free markets allow competition to drive down costs: Mainly need tort reform & eliminate the frivolous lawsuits. Without this everything is moot Interstate access - state lines hardly seem relevant for math based algos Get pharma out of insurance decisions |
总统大选 › Electoral College
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
8>8 Personal answerIt's all relative to remaining dominant |
罪行 › Collective Bargaining
8>8 Personal answerDepends on how this is connected to wider police standards |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerNeeds more context |
医保 › 退伍军人事务私有化
8>8 Personal answer更多,并且把现有的退伍军人医疗系统改为一个个人医疗存款账户 |
教育 › School Vouchers
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 无人机
8>8 Personal answer不,只应该搜集情报,而不杀恐怖分子嫌疑人 |
科学 › 转基因标签
8>8 Personal answer应该,我相信责任制食品工程的科学性,但是我不相信食品公司卖这些食品的动机 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answerDepends on he severity of the impact of their crimes. |
教育 › Universal Pre-K
8>8 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
8>8 Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
8>8 Personal answerNo not until they get the corruption & waste out of the system |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerThink this should be resolved at the local level |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
8>8 Personal answerGenerally speaking no but but conditions on Russian aggression as it's a border state. |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
8>8 Personal answerShould be limited by felonies of a certain order |
国家安全 › Military Congressional Approval
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Paris Climate Agreement
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerWho is in charge of the "terrorist" designation...? Extremely overused at the moment. At current levels - govts could assistance upset parents at School board meetings |
外交政策 › 北约
8>8 Personal answerThere should be increased minimums of % GDP spending, air defense, viable troops, and mobility. If they aren't willing to spend at same levels as US - than no |
教育 › Open for Learning Recovery Benefit Program
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Juneteenth
8>8 Personal answerNo. Are you fucking kidding me...?! |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerNo but there should be regulation with respect to comparable ad spend as a campaign contribution |
外交政策 › India Arms
8>8 Personal answerToo nuanced |
国内政策 › Edward Snowden(爱德华·斯诺登)
8>8 Personal answerDepends. Why should I trust the govt/MSM gave me the true set of facts to begin with...? |
外交政策 › Jerusalem
8>8 Personal answerHow.is this relevant to US NatSec...? |
教育 › School Truancy
8>8 Personal answerHave no idea what the criminal statute is |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Gig Workers
8>8 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.