Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › LGBT收养权
JS>JS Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
经济 › 同工同酬
JS>JS Personal answer不,还有太多其它可变因素了,比如教育、经验和任期都能决定公平的工资待遇 |
医保 › Pre-Existing Conditions
JS>JS Personal answerNo, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions |
社会 › Gun Buyback
JS>JS Personal answerNo, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment |
社会 › Gender Transition
JS>JS Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
医保 › 精神健康
JS>JS Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › 宗教自由法案
JS>JS Personal answer应该,任何企业都应该能够以任何理由拒绝服务 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
JS>JS Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
JS>JS Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
社会 › 计划生育资金
JS>JS Personal answer应该,他们的服务远不止堕胎,还可以通过癌症筛查、产前服务和领养推荐等挽救许多生命 |
经济 › 带薪病假
JS>JS Personal answer不应该,私营企业应自主决定其提供给员工的竞争激励金额,而不应由政府强制要求 |
社会 › Racial Sensitivity Training
JS>JS Personal answerYes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
JS>JS Personal answerYes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist |
教育 › 学生贷款
JS>JS Personal answerNo, but we should still reduce interest rates for student loans |
教育 › Free College for All
JS>JS Personal answerNo, but provide more scholarship opportunities for low-income students |
社会 › Hate Speech
JS>JS Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
移民 › 非法移民拘留
JS>JS Personal answer不,仅在他们犯了暴力罪行时再这样做 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
JS>JS Personal answerYes and no; depends on the virus, immune system, and the quality of the vaccine. |
医保 › 医疗补助
JS>JS Personal answer是的,但只是为老年人和残疾人增加。 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
JS>JS Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
罪行 › Qualified Immunity for Police
JS>JS Personal answerNo, and increase the personal liability for misconduct |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
JS>JS Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
环境 › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
JS>JS Personal answerNo, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels |
社会 › 安全空间
JS>JS Personal answerNo, college is meant to challenge students thoughts and opinions so they are prepared for real life |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
JS>JS Personal answerNO; government shouldn't be forcing vaccine on the people, especially the boosters as natural immunity is the better option for fighting these viruses |
外交政策 › 北约
JS>JS Personal answerYes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies |
社会 › 宪法第一修正案
JS>JS Personal answer不应该,宗教是我们国家历史的一个重要方面 |
医保 › Medicaid Work Requirement
JS>JS Personal answerno; depends on ability to work, health, and age of the person |
国内政策 › 枪支责任
JS>JS Personal answer否,枪支制造和经销商,只会因疏忽而负有法律责任 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
JS>JS Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
罪行 › 对青少年的单独监禁
JS>JS Personal answer不应该,有必要单独监禁那些对自己和其他囚犯有危险的暴力罪犯 |
罪行 › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
JS>JS Personal answer不 |
移民 › 公民考试
JS>JS Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
JS>JS Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
医保 › 安全港
JS>JS Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
医保 › Medicare Drug Prices
JS>JS Personal answeryes; because Medicare is run by the government |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
JS>JS Personal answeryes; private businesses have the right to have their own policies |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
JS>JS Personal answerYes; but only as reinforcement and backup |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
JS>JS Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
经济 › 经济刺激
JS>JS Personal answer应该,但采用为受衰退打击最严重的领域提供帮助的形式 |
经济 › 资产增值税
JS>JS Personal answer不应该,提高资本收益税将限制我们经济中的投资 |
移民 › 州内学费
JS>JS Personal answer不,他们应该承担和海外学生一样的费用 |
医保 › World Health Organization
JS>JS Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
JS>JS Personal answer是的,而且他们在任的每一年要求一个公开审计 |
经济 › 加班费
JS>JS Personal answerYes, and all employees should be paid time-and-a-half for overtime hours regardless of their pay scale |
总统大选 › Electoral College
JS>JS Personal answerNo, but reform so that votes are distributed proportionally instead of the current winner take all system |
罪行 › Collective Bargaining
JS>JS Personal answeryes and no |
环境 › Animal Testing
JS>JS Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
外交政策 › 折磨
JS>JS Personal answer是的,但仅在万不得已的情况下 |
医保 › 退伍军人事务私有化
JS>JS Personal answer更多,退伍军人应该可以去看任何他们选择的医生 |
教育 › School Vouchers
JS>JS Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools instead |
外交政策 › 无人机
JS>JS Personal answer不,只应该搜集情报,而不杀恐怖分子嫌疑人 |
科学 › 转基因标签
JS>JS Personal answer是的,消费者们有权利知道他们的食物里有什么东西 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
JS>JS Personal answer不 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
JS>JS Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
教育 › Universal Pre-K
JS>JS Personal answerYes, but funding should come from states instead of the federal government |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
JS>JS Personal answerif they deny the shelter provided for them, that's on them. Public streets should not be camped with the homeless because it causes disturbances |
教育 › Charter Schools
JS>JS Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools |
移民 › 双重国籍
JS>JS Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
经济 › 房地产遗产税
JS>JS Personal answeryes; decrease over time but not all of a sudden drastic change |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
JS>JS Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
外交政策 › 恐怖主义
JS>JS Personal answer不应该,他们应该在军事法庭上接受审问,但不应该对其实施折磨 |
国家安全 › Military Congressional Approval
JS>JS Personal answerNo, Congress should approve all military conflicts |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
JS>JS Personal answer不 |
环境 › Paris Climate Agreement
JS>JS Personal answerno; we need to preserve the environment and the globe for future generations. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
JS>JS Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › 北约
JS>JS Personal answer是的,拒绝保卫其他北约国家开创了一个全球力量平衡的危险先例 |
教育 › Open for Learning Recovery Benefit Program
JS>JS Personal answeryes; some families job and incomes are affected by covid |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
JS>JS Personal answer是的,NAFTA 帮助降低消费品的价格 |
外交政策 › India Arms
JS>JS Personal answerNo, and we should increase diplomatic efforts to resolve conflicts peacefully |
外交政策 › 国家安全局监视
JS>JS Personal answer是的,监视所有异国的情况对跟踪潜在的恐怖袭击威胁是必不可少的。 |
外交政策 › Jerusalem
JS>JS Personal answerYes, foreign governments should recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel |
教育 › School Truancy
JS>JS Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
JS>JS Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
外交政策 › F-35
JS>JS Personal answeryes and no; keep producing if there is a demand from US and its Allies, and stop if no longer needed. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.