Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 同工同酬
8>8 Personal answer不,还有太多其它可变因素了,比如教育、经验和任期都能决定公平的工资待遇 |
总统大选 › 2020 US Presidential Election Legitimacy
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › Pre-Existing Conditions
8>8 Personal answerYes, and the government should not be involved in health insurance |
教育 › School Reopenings
8>8 Personal answerYes, but offer a choice between online and in-person learning |
医保 › Masks on Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
社会 › 宗教自由法案
8>8 Personal answerYes, solely based of religious beliefs. Most other cases based off race and ethnicity should be handled in accordance with the civil rights act. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
8>8 Personal answerYes, only after the proper training and psychological screening prior too and periodically after authorization. |
经济 › 带薪病假
8>8 Personal answerNo, private businesses should decide the amount of competitive incentives they offer to employees instead of a government mandate. The concept is good I think that it should be bargained between companies and the employees. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
8>8 Personal answerYes, also members of congress and government should not be allowed to fill staff roles or lobby after their term completion. |
外交政策 › 伊朗
8>8 Personal answerNo, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
8>8 Personal answerNo, this is a derived from Marxist ideology. This theory only creates division and sows hatred amongst the US populace. This doesn’t mean we can’t address any wrong doings in our history and note how far we have come. The Democratic Republic is an experiment that is ever changing and should always be improving to help the populace. CRT and any of the “critical” theories disenfranchises people from all walks of life. Telling one group no matter what you can not improve your situation and another no matter what you are the villain, has caused nothing but damage to the fabric of our collective agreement that this governmental process and systems attached should be looking out for the people’s interests and the improvement of society. |
教育 › Free College for All
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 禁飞名单枪支管制
8>8 Personal answer不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的 |
国内政策 › Supreme Court Reform
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answer是的,社交媒体公司有政治偏向,需要受到监管 |
医保 › 医疗补助
8>8 Personal answer不,应当只有老人和残疾人有资格。 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Qualified Immunity for Police
8>8 Personal answerThis policy needs to be looked at further. I do not believe that in every case a law enforcement officer deserves qualified immunity. How ever if it is removed completely you begin to cause a detriment to the officer and they are no longer likely to provide an active role in the prevention of crime. |
环境 › 可替代能源
8>8 Personal answerNo, wind is an unreliable source for large populations. Coal, Oil, Gas and Nuclear are long term reliable sources. Subsidies should be removed across the board and the emphasis of zero emissions should be placed on the energy sector. There are current technologies that allow that to be the case now. Additionally the energy sector should be allowed to innovate to meet this requirement. |
环境 › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
8>8 Personal answerYes, but with very strict environmental regulations |
社会 › 安全空间
8>8 Personal answerNo, college is meant to challenge students thoughts and opinions so they are prepared for real life |
国内政策 › 爱国者法案
8>8 Personal answerNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
经济 › 政府支出
8>8 Personal answerYes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional. If the agency is rife with wasteful spending habits the government has a duty to scale back spending until it meets the required output or the intent of the agency. Simplicity is key to ensure no one program is earning more than its keep. |
医保 › Medicaid Work Requirement
8>8 Personal answerYes, this will help States reduce Medicaid costs |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answerNo, but legalize drugs, however a larger emphasis should be put on rehabilitation, than there currently is. |
医保 › Medicare Drug Prices
8>8 Personal answer不,政府不应该干涉自由市场 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
经济 › 工会
8>8 Personal answerIn many circumstances unions help protect worker rights. The unions today are corrupted and should have their power limited on top of banning campaign donations to anyone running for political office. |
经济 › 资产增值税
8>8 Personal answer不应该,提高资本收益税将限制我们经济中的投资 |
移民 › 州内学费
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
8>8 Personal answerYes, but they should continue to support the Afghan national government. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
8>8 Personal answerYes, but there should be an extreme importance and priority put on the protection of surrounding environments and water supplies. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
8>8 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
总统大选 › 说客
8>8 Personal answer是的,而且成为一项终身禁令 |
经济 › 加班费
8>8 Personal answerNo, the worker entered an agreement to be paid a flat rate regardless of how many or how few hours they work. This is between the company and the employee. |
总统大选 › Electoral College
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Collective Bargaining
8>8 Personal answerI support limiting the power of unions across the board. I don’t believe they should be completely abolished however in many circumstances these entities allow for misconduct to go unpunished. |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
8>8 Personal answerYes, however it has to be linked and proven their drugs have caused death and/or detriment to the population they were trafficking to. On top of this they have to be repeat offenders. This should be done on a case by case basis. Not all traffickers should receive the death penalty. |
外交政策 › 折磨
8>8 Personal answer是,应允许使用心理而不是生理的策略 |
医保 › 退伍军人事务私有化
8>8 Personal answer更多,退伍军人应该可以去看任何他们选择的医生 |
教育 › School Vouchers
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 无人机
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only with permission from the country in question. Unless it is a country in which a us involved conflict is already occurring. |
科学 › 转基因标签
8>8 Personal answer应该,我相信责任制食品工程的科学性,但是我不相信食品公司卖这些食品的动机 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answerYes, but it must be determined on a case by case basis. The member must conduct community service as well as pay reparations for any damages they have cause if it hasn’t be already identified. |
教育 › Universal Pre-K
8>8 Personal answerNo, use a voucher system instead |
交通运输 › 公共交通
8>8 Personal answerI believe the government should cut out wasteful spending practices. There is enough money going to the program to update infrastructure. The removal of wasteful spending will allow the resources to be updated and repaired. The government should also not accept contracts with companies that have history of sandbagging work to draw more money than agreed upon out of the government. |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerYes, and we should move to school choice where the funding goes to the student over the institution. Allowing a student and parent the ability to choose the path that best fits the need of the student will greatly increase productivity in our younger generation as well as cut redundancies and wasteful spending. |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answerNo, all citizens of the United States should have solely US citizenship. It is an imperative that the us populace should have allegiance and common agreement on the fundamental principles of the constitution and the bill of rights. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
国家安全 › Military Congressional Approval
8>8 Personal answerThis question is too broad for a definitive answer. If the attack means that start of a new conflict then the President should allow congress to decide the proper procedures and way forward. If this is within an already existing conflict then I believe the president has the authority to decide strikes against strategic military or combatant targets allowing for the change in the battle field landscape. |
环境 › Paris Climate Agreement
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answerThe government should scale back the liberties these companies have had. If the company has conducted sensorship on users and acts outside the purview of the detailed guidelines from the liberties these companies enjoy, then they should be penalized. The government should also not standby and allow these companies to influence policy that will destroy competition and innovation within the realms they operate. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
外交政策 › 北约
8>8 Personal answerYes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power However other nato nations must be held to the standard set at the inception of The organization. |
国内政策 › Juneteenth
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › India Arms
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Edward Snowden(爱德华·斯诺登)
8>8 Personal answer是的,他应该受到《举报人保护法》保护 |
外交政策 › 古巴
8>8 Personal answerNo, lift the travel embargo but do not allow trade until Cuba becomes a democratic republic |
外交政策 › Jerusalem
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
教育 › School Truancy
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 空军一号
8>8 Personal answerYes, based off the requirements of the time. But it still should be a cost effective solution. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.