More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Libertarian voters
Last answered 34 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Libertarian voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
7 years ago by themindunleashed.org
8 years ago by huffingtonpost.com
8 years ago by dailycurrant.com
8 years ago by dontbeafuckingidiot.com
8 years ago by youtube.com
8 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes - but only after a non-intrusive and accurate test is developed that would discern if a person is driving while impaired. A limit would need to be establised similar to BAC for DUI. The present urine tests only test for metabolized TCH, with no sense... 8 years ago from a Republican in Amherst, NH
Marijuana should be decriminalized, yet usage discouraged through a high fine. The state needs to reinforce a higher moral standard. 8 years ago from a Republican in Bellaire, TX
No and we should close our borders in real effective ways and that would solve a host of problems such as illegal , "that means NOT LEGAL" immigration, human trafficking, drug traffic, terrorists entry. We got problems folks. 8 years ago from a Republican in Rutland, VT
No, and make any detectable level in blood or urine be considered proof of possession and to be made public. However, limit the sanction to loss of driving privileges and loss of DOT or HHS jobs and loss of other jobs at their employer's discretion.... 8 years ago from a Libertarian in La Porte, IN
If we'd started out without regulations and treated it as a social issue to begin with it won't be as much of an issue, but after a long time of having it illegal it would be too swift of a change-- like teenagers turning 21 and having their... 8 years ago from a Republican in Eugene, OR
Yes. It took a Constitutional Amendment to prohibit alcohol, I have yet to see one for cannabis. Not to mention it was made 'illegal' due solely to the fact that the robber barons of the day wanted to stifle competition. 8 years ago from a Republican in Macomb, IL
Yes, BUT there is a special strain of such narcotic developed that eliminates the key chemical (THC) for drug abuse. Such strain, if asked for should only be allowed for cancer patients and only after psychological exam. 8 years ago from a Green in Fayette, MO
All drugs, we all should be able to go down to the local Pharmacy, and get for example my bloodpressure meds, without having a script for them, which would reduce the price. Take the profit out of it, and you take the crime out of it. Still make it... 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Smithtown, NY
Yes, but safeguards need to be in place first. For example, law enforcement needs equipment that will determine whether or not a suspect is under the influence of cannabis. Testing for metabolites in the bloodstream in inaccurate and unfair. 8 years ago from a Republican in Vincennes, IN
Yes, limit sales to only people over age 25 after the brain has fully developed. Make sales or distribution to those under age manditory 10 years. The brain is not fully developed until after age 25. Those under age 25 have been shown have little to no... 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Waukesha, WI
3 unbiased healthcare professionals would need to recommend it, person should be licensed to smoke it meaning a test like to drive a car, person must know all the laws and pass the test. Not tax deductible ever as medical like alcohol. No license, no... 8 years ago from a Republican in Eugene, OR
Yes. Legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it. Free all citizens jailed for drug offenses to further halt any costs of inmate food, water, etc. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Peoria, AZ
Legalize all substances, it is personal choice of what to consume. Prohibition is making a crime out of something that is not a crime. Victimless and wasteful are just a few terms to describe the war on drugs. Facilitating a prison industrial complex.... 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Florence, AL
Educate the people on the so called "Drug" and why it was made illegal I the first place. And that it has 0 deaths and all our brains actually have one of the active ingredients already. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Lyons, IL
It should be each states decision to legalize marijuana. 8 years ago from a Republican in Flushing, NY
Yes, but only for limited recreational use. 8 years ago from a Republican in Bolingbrook, IL
Eliminate all prohibition laws regarding plants and other substances. Prohibition failed for alcohol, it has failed for plant and other materials, and the free market should control the market for those materials just like it does for so many others. 8 years ago from a Republican in Meridian, ID
Yes, but it should be very heavily regulated. My proposed regulations are as follows
1) Can only be prescribed to terminal ill patients w/o a chance of recovery, for example hospice patients.
2) They have to smoke it in a designated area of the building on site and can't leave with the drug. This will prevent distribution to minors and make sure they aren't contributing to the drug trade.
3) Set limits that strictly control the amount, and frequency of refills.
This reduces the chance of drug abuse from an individual.
4) Employees who work at facilities are give the prescription over the patient to smoke must be checked and searched to ensure non leaves the premises. The sites that grow Marijuana must comply to the before mentioned regulations and both the growing sites and distributions centers are susceptible to closure upon violation of any regulation. 8 years ago from a Republican in Sterling Heights, MI
Yes. Legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it, however, all drug related accidents should be punished heavily. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Fernley, NV
Yes, but only for medical use under the supervision of a certified medical practitioner. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Glenwood Springs, CO
Legalize all drugs and non violent crimes, free all people who in jail for just drug offenses. The federal government has no business trying to control the morality of the people. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Laguna Niguel, CA
Yes! Legalize, regulate, tax and treat marijuana like our other legal drugs, such as alcohol, tobacco, caffeine and prescription drugs with severe penalties for lawbreakers. 8 years ago from a Republican in Tucson, AZ
Unlike alcohol, there is no amount you can use that doesn't impair a person. I simply don't know how you could regulate its use to prevent impaired use of equipment, impaired workers etc. I have no problem with personal use at home or with those... 8 years ago from a Republican in West Bend, WI
No. Except for those who have been evaluated by a specialist saying that Marijuana could help their conditions. Make it hard to get and penalize heavily people who are found to be giving it to children or smoking around children. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Concrete, WA
No, but it should just be a violation, like a traffic ticket. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Potwin, KS