Genetic engineering involves modifying the DNA of organisms to prevent or treat diseases. Proponents argue that it could lead to breakthroughs in curing genetic disorders and improving public health. Opponents argue that it raises ethical concerns and potential risks of unintended consequences.
85% Yes |
15% No |
85% Yes |
15% No |
See how support for each position on “Genetic Engineering” has changed over time for 3.6k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Genetic Engineering” has changed over time for 3.6k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9QT5LY3 2wks2W
Yes, however only after ensuring their is no risks in doing so and also at the consent of the people
@9PPZHFZ1mo1MO
No, as this could be misused for eugenics purposes.
@9R5B8KL1wk1W
Yes, so long as trials and tests are not conducted on sentient beings and that the products are clean of contagions.
@9R4G6NH1wk1W
Yes, so long as there are strict protocols in place to prevent diseases from being released that will potentially cause an outbreak.
@9R48QND1wk1W
Yes, but only through using animals as test subjects until we are absolutely certain our treatments can work on them without any fatalities
@9R32QV31wk1W
The government may do this but also allow private interests to develop such technologies as well. There must not exist a state monopoly on such research.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
