+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 291k America voters.

80%
Yes
20%
No
80%
Yes
20%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 291k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 291k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RJH6B8  from Texas  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, while ensuring ethical research that does not lead to supporting ideals such as selective reproduction or eugenics

  @clbcarman answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only to treat agreed-upon classified diseases, as going beyond this is a slippery slope to eugenics.

 @9TM97YS from Virginia  answered…7mos7MO

Yes but they need to be very careful and only use research for diseases because this could easily lead to dark places like eugenics.

 @9QT5LY3  from Texas  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, however only after ensuring their is no risks in doing so and also at the consent of the people

 @9WCWFBK from Ohio  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, so long as the general public are not subject to it without their consent or knowledge. Fluoridation and its origin being a good example as to why health being in the hands of the federal government with the absolute final say is a bad idea.

 @9PPZHFZ from South Carolina  answered…10mos10MO

 @9S739LH from Tennessee  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, however the government should also fund programs for lifestyle changes that can help to prevent and treat diseases

 @9ZGX9KJ  from Ohio  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, while ensuring ethical research does not lead to supporting ideals such as selective reproduction or eugenics.