This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 566 Georgia voters.
46% Yes |
54% No |
46% Yes |
54% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 566 Georgia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 566 Georgia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Georgia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9RDKXM811mos11MO
No, but the government should still require manual driving in case there is a technology malfunction.
@9NCVR3K1yr1Y
Yes, or else the cause of accidents will be defended as “technological errors” instead of human negligence.
@9TRVT2F 9mos9MO
Yes, restrictions are necessary and laws need to be updated to hold companies accountable for faulty autonomous vehicles causing accidents.
@amayerica#1 12mos12MO
Yes, until we have a clear understanding of what the technology inhibits for us to completely rely on it.
@9TQ2NYH9mos9MO
I see both sides, I agree tech can make things safer but that we should also be careful and intentional with our use of it
@9TR44349mos9MO
Yes and no, because while advanced tech could be very helpful in the cases of disabled drivers, this could lead to tech malfunctions and possible disaster. It might make driving significantly safer though, as some people are bad at driving.
@9VJZYWB8mos8MO
Yes, but not now. In the future this may become a bigger issue but it’s not something to worry about at the moment.
@B5LC3933wks3W
Only if the driver has proven to be incapable of operating a vehicle without the use of technology. (excluding those with disabilities or impairments)
Join in on the most popular conversations.
