Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
68% Yes |
32% No |
68% Yes |
32% No |
See how support for each position on “Carpooling and Shared Transportation” has changed over time for 3.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Carpooling and Shared Transportation” has changed over time for 3.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9R8GDMH5 days5D
Public transit should be invested into for cities and high population areas but should not affect rural areas and how they choose to deal with transportation
@9H4SFM6 2wks2W
No, and the government should invest in more robust public transportation options.
@887SFZP 3wks3W
No, incentivizing the development of public transport would be preferable
@9QQH2W93wks3W
It should be done, but Instesf of the government, by the people.
@9QPTMPJ3wks3W
Yes, but shouldnt be monetary incentives for the most part
@9PVMLSQ4wks4W
Yes, as long as they don’t punish more traditional forms of transportation.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
