+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 522 Constitution Party voters.

82%
Yes
18%
No
82%
Yes
18%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 522 Constitution Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 522 Constitution Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Constitution Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8XLR4JX  from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

 @9NPXKX8 from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

Yes but only until the structure is deemed broken beyond repair by State authorities and has to be replaced by something new.

 @9PVYPJQ from Massachusetts  answered…12mos12MO

Yes, until the structure is deemed broken beyond repair after a thorough inspection by state officials.

 @9NQL5VP from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, unless existing roads and infrastructure are too old and new infrastructure is deemed more suitable to support growth.

 @9RTR6JWfrom Washington  answered…11mos11MO

New infrastructure that prioritizes alternative forms of transportation to cars should be considered rather than repair. New car centric infrastructure should be limited.

  @B4YKFQR from Massachusetts  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only until the infrastructure is deemed broken beyond repair after a thorough inspection by state officials.

 @9T8WV9J from Washington  answered…10mos10MO

i think the priority for maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges should be as equal as building new infrastructure, as long as the building is actually needed.

 @9SGS2K2 from Kansas  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, if the current infrastructure would meet our current needs when fixed. If the infrastructure really needs to be replaced, then replace it.