In 2022 lawmakers in the U.S. state of California passed legislation which empowered the state medical board to discipline doctors in the state who “disseminate misinformation or disinformation” that contradicts the “contemporary scientific consensus” or is “contrary to the standard of care.” Proponents of the law argue that doctors should be punished for spreading misinformation and that there is clear consensus on certain issues such as that apples contain sugar, measles is caused by a virus, and Down syndrome is caused by a chromosomal abnormality. Opponents argue that the law limits freedom of speech and scientific “consensus” often changes within mere months.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 376 Connecticut voters.
39% Yes |
61% No |
34% Yes |
36% No |
4% Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
12% No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
1% Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license |
9% No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient |
4% No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 376 Connecticut voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 376 Connecticut voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Connecticut voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9GX62WV2yrs2Y
No, only if the advice was proven to harm the patient. Doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts scientific consensus.
@9BJF3B42yrs2Y
Yes, but only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
@9GWKTHP2yrs2Y
They should not. Scientific consensus about transgenderism and such has been proven WRONG, and yet everyone acts like it is true.
@9WQGF958mos8MO
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
@9H5VH622yrs2Y
No, only if the advice was proven to harm the patient, but doctors should be required to disclose that their advice contradicts scientific consensus
@9GFPK3Z2yrs2Y
Yes, but only when the advice was proven to harm the patient, scientific consensus can change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
@9FF9SFF2yrs2Y
No, but doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, this must also be proven not to harm the patient
@B3TL4FV3mos3MO
no, doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, and be penalized if the advice is proven to harm the patient.
Join in on the most popular conversations.