A school voucher is a certificate of government funding that students can use to pay for the school of their choice. Students are given the vouchers and can use them to pay for non-public school systems including private schools, home schools and charter schools Proponents argue that the vouchers will create a better education system by promoting competition between schools. Opponents argue that the voucher system removes funds from public schools and redirects it toward private institutions.
46% Yes |
54% No |
37% Yes |
43% No |
4% Yes, but only for low income families |
10% No, we should focus on improving our public schools instead |
3% Yes, but I would rather privatize all education |
1% No, and ban private schools |
2% Yes, but only for students with exceptional athletic, academic, or service achievements |
See how support for each position on “School Vouchers” has changed over time for 48.4k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “School Vouchers” has changed over time for 48.4k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@957QQY72yrs2Y
Yes, but I would rather nationalize all education.
@8RWPFZ93yrs3Y
Yes, but only for secular schools
@8QRJT3D3yrs3Y
Get rid of the school system return to monkey
@6V4692V3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should focus on improving our public schools instead
@8QRNPH53yrs3Y
Yes, but only for low income families and students with exceptional athletic, academic, or service achievements
@8ZP76SL2yrs2Y
Yes, but we should focus on improving our public schools
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “School Vouchers” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH3wks3W
In Tennessee, the debate over school vouchers and gun legislation has taken center stage, reflecting the state's grappling with educational reform and public safety concerns. Governor Bill Lee's school choice legislation, which aims to expand school vouchers, has swiftly moved through several committees, facing minimal opposition from Republicans. This move underscores a significant push towards offering parents and students more flexibility in choosing educational institutions, amidst a broader national conversation about the role of public and private schooling in America.Concurrently, Tennessee's approach to gun legislation, particularly in the aftermath of the Covenant School shooting, reveals a complex and contentious political landscape. Despite calls for stricter gun control measures, including the implementation of an extreme risk protection order (ERPO) law proposed by Governor Lee, the state's Republican supermajority has largely resisted significant changes. This resistance highlights the deep divisions within the state and the country at large over how to balance Second Amendment rights with the need for increased public safety.The juxtaposition of these two major legislative efforts illustrates the multifaceted challenges facing Tennessee. On one hand, the push for expanded school vouchers reflects a desire to innovate within the educational sector and provide more choices to families. On the other, the struggle over gun legislation underscores the ongoing debate over how to prevent violence while respecting constitutional rights.As Tennessee continues to navigate these issues, the outcomes will likely have implications beyond the state's borders. The debates over school choice and gun control are emblematic of broader national discussions, making Tennessee a microcosm of the political and social challenges facing the United States today.Looking ahead, the decisions made by Tennessee's lawmakers on these fronts will not only affect the state's residents but also contribute to the national dialogue on education reform and public safety. As such, the eyes of the nation are on Tennessee, waiting to see how it addresses these critical and contentious issues.
@ISIDEWITH4wks4W
Texas is on the verge of a significant shift in its education system, with Governor Greg Abbott announcing that the state is just two House votes away from passing a controversial school voucher program. This legislation, which has been a focal point of Abbott's agenda, aims to provide parents with the choice to use public funding for private schooling options for their children. The governor's push for school vouchers has intensified following the recent primary elections, where he targeted members within his own party who were hesitant to support the initiative. Abbott's strategy seems to be paying off, as he confidently predicts that the upcoming May runoffs will secure the necessary votes to pass the voucher plan.Abbott's campaign against reluctant Republicans has not been without its challenges, but the governor's appearance with House Speaker Dade Phelan signals a united front within the party's leadership. This collaboration is crucial as they head into the primary runoffs, where the outcome could decisively impact the future of Texas education. The governor's office has been vocal about the importance of school choice, framing it as a pivotal issue for Texas families seeking the best educational opportunities for their children.The proposed voucher system has sparked a heated debate across the state, with supporters arguing that it empowers parents and provides children with more educational options. Critics, however, warn that diverting public funds to private schools could undermine the public education system and widen the gap in educational equity. As Texas stands on the cusp of potentially transformative educational policy, all eyes are on the upcoming runoffs, which could either solidify or derail Abbott's vision for school choice in the Lone Star State.
@CommittedMandrill5mos5MO
Today’s school-choice ecosystem, which one might refer to as “market lite,” has helped thousands of families. But millions are waiting, and current choice programs operate within the same inadequate framework. Increasing choice on the margin through partial vouchers, magnet school…
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)