More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Race (Other) voters
Last answered 10 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Race (Other) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 9, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Race data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
8 years ago by rt.com
8 years ago by net.au
8 years ago by theguardian.com
8 years ago by nytimes.com
8 years ago by net.au
8 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
There is not enough clear information of pros/cons to make an informed decision. Fracking chemicals should absolutely be made known along with all potential side effects, and affected communities should have the opportunity to vote for themselves. We... 9 years ago from a Democrat in Pasadena, CA
Yes, but be smart about it- I.E. Take into consideration where you will be fracking and if it will affect peoples homes, water, health and overall well being and quality of living. 9 years ago from a Republican in North Richland Hills, TX
Yes, but not in highly populated areas with more vision on what the results to the earth are and if its more harm then good sotta stop. 9 years ago from a Republican in San Jacinto, CA
No, we would pursue more sustainable energy sources AND it is destroying our environment. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Salt Lake City, UT
If there is an earthquake has it been studied in that Fracking could be the cause??? I believe any company who has the potential to endager live such as the last hazardess waste poisoning of water should pay into a cleanup program (which should remain... 9 years ago from a Democrat in Lawrence, MA
More oversight is needed, and improve methods to insure the environment is protected without polluting the water, etc. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Laveen, AZ
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking and we should pursue more sustainable energy sources as well. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Colton, CA
Yes, but continue research into long term effects and have companies accept responsibility for environmental problems it may create. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Woodbridge, VA