More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income (over $200K) voters
Last answered 4 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income (over $200K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 3, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by ctvnews.ca
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
"Unreasonable"? Who decides THAT? And if Obamacare provisions is required coverage, the whole business is unreasonable. another "too late." In theory, yes, ban "unreasonable"; as it now works out, no. 6 years ago from a Republican in Redlands, CA
Only if there is evidence of collusion among insurance companies for setting rates. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Palo Alto, CA
Insurance needs to be overhauled and pharmaceutical companies need to be limited in any involvement with rates. Pharmaceutical company's need to be reviewed and their 'power' limited. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Yorba Linda, CA