More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (married) voters
Last answered 4 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (married) voters.
No, casinos should be considered destinations so they don't overwhelm and prey on specific communities
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 3, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
Limit casino to closest town of reasonable Size . We marginalized native Americans and pushed them onto less desirable land for reservations. 6 years ago from a Republican in Corona, CA
Yes as long as they are placed on local tax rolls and that they contribute a small percentage of profits to local redevelopment funding. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Escondido, CA
Regardless, gambling should be legalized in the state and anyone should be allowed to operate a casino, not just Indian tribes, and the casinos should be regulated and taxed. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Ukiah, CA
Yes. This land belonged to Native Americans first and they should be able to build casinos wherever they are financially able to do so. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Hayward, CA
Yes, just like any other business should be allowed to operate. 6 years ago from a Republican in Pasadena, CA
Only if they agree to state regulations rather than those applied to Native Americans only on native land. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Moreno Valley, CA
All gambling should be legal everywhere, by any business person. This can then be taxed, and help our state out of debt. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Pasadena, CA
Yes, as long as they are then paying taxes on revenue earned off the reservation. 6 years ago from a Socialist in Ramona, CA
Yes as long as they pay taxes just like every other business. 6 years ago from a Republican in Arroyo Grande, CA
I don't have a comment until I read further. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Oceano, CA
If you grant them the ability to operate a casino off their land then investors should be also granted that right. on top of that, if casinos are open they should not get any special waivers, prevlgious and obey all local, state and federal law in regards... 6 years ago from a Republican in Lake Elsinore, CA
Gambling - all of it - should be decriminalized. Why should the government(s) get to operate a fool's game called the lottery? Why should betting on the Super Bowl be illegal between colleagues? Let it all go. Get government out of the business... 6 years ago from a Republican in Palmdale, CA
Yes, but end the favored federal susbsidies for Indian business activity. 6 years ago from a Republican in San Lorenzo, CA
Yes, but off reservation they are subject to the desires and regulations of the community in which they wish to operate. 6 years ago from a Green in Watsonville, CA
Only if other non Indian casinos can operate on the same land. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Tulare, CA
Yes, and everyone else should, also (let local govt's manage it). Online gambling should be legalized and taxed, with a portion of taxes directed into addict support. 6 years ago from a Democrat in La Mesa, CA
Yes, gambling should be legal and not just for Indian tribes. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Glendale, CA