More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 4 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
No, casinos should be considered destinations so they don't overwhelm and prey on specific communities
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 3, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
Limit casino to closest town of reasonable Size . We marginalized native Americans and pushed them onto less desirable land for reservations. 6 years ago from a Republican in Corona, CA
Yes. This land belonged to Native Americans first and they should be able to build casinos wherever they are financially able to do so. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Hayward, CA
Only if they agree to state regulations rather than those applied to Native Americans only on native land. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Moreno Valley, CA
Yes, but off reservation they are subject to the desires and regulations of the community in which they wish to operate. 6 years ago from a Green in Watsonville, CA
Only if other non Indian casinos can operate on the same land. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Tulare, CA